Capital market developments of the last several decades are not going to be fundamentally reversed, nor should we want them to be. Reform by nostalgia is not usually an effective approach, since it tends to forget the problems of the past and deny how much has changed. The task is to refashion a regulatory structure so as to encourage the efficient allocation of capital to productive uses, while protecting the financial system from the defects and excesses that are inherent in financial markets. Jordan Kimmel says transperency is the first big step we must take.
Capital market developments of the last several decades are not going to be fundamentally reversed, nor should we want them to be. Reform by nostalgia is not usually an effective approach, since it tends to forget the problems of the past and deny how much has changed. The task is to refashion a regulatory structure so as to encourage the efficient allocation of capital to productive uses, while protecting the financial system from the defects and excesses that are inherent in financial markets. Jordan Kimmel says transperency is the first big step we must take.
Featured in this video is John Jensen discussing the case of CDOC vs The City of Los Angeles over the recently enacted spay and neuter regulations that many dog owners and breeders feel are over reaching, actually harmful to dogs and allow the state to intrude into the dog owners rights to own, breed and care for their animal.
No area of the law or regulation creates more controversy and passion then anything linked to dogs, cats and other domestic pets and the lawsuit brought by Concerned Dog Owners of California (CDOC) against the City of Los Angeles over their mandatory spay and neuter regulations is no exception.
David Frei of the Westminster Kennel Club, a long time dog breeder and advocate of responsible dog ownership discussing how mandatory spay and neuter laws can have unitended negative consequences on the dogs, responsible breeders and actually encourage “puppy mills” which is something breed clubs work to eliminate.
David Frei of the Westminster Kennel Club, a long time dog breeder and advocate of responsible dog ownership discussing how mandatory spay and neuter laws can have unitended negative consequences on the dogs, responsible breeders and actually encourage “puppy mills” which is something breed clubs work to eliminate.
Featured in this video is John Jensen discussing
the case of CDOC vs The City of Los Angeles over the recently enacted spay and neuter regulations that many dog owners and breeders feel are over reaching, actually harmful to dogs and allow the state to intrude into the dog owners rights to own, breed and care for their animal. This is an interesting constitutional legal issue and these video interviews outline this increasingly important case law as to the right of the state to regulate the ownership, breeding and control of dogs and cats nationally.
Dog regulations run amok? The CDOC vs The City of Los Angeles.
No area of the law or regulation creates more controversy and passion then anything linked to dogs, cats and other domestic pets and the lawsuit brought by Concerned Dog Owners of California (CDOC) against the City of Los Angeles over their mandatory spay and neuter regulations is no exception. Last year they filed a lawsuit to over turn the mandatory spay and neuter regulations imposed on all dog owners in the City, in which set dates for spay and neuter are established, civil and administrative penalties are outlined and entire categories of dog breeders, owners and hobbyists now fall under increasingly strict laws and oversight.
In this interview Scott Drake Interviews chairperson of Concerned Dog Owners of California Cathie Turner
At the time this Interview the stock market had dropped into the the 6500 range. Scott Drake talks with Jordan Kimmel (Magnet Investment Group) about what future regulation might look like. Can you say "transparency"?
At the time this Interview the stock market had dropped into the the 6500 range. Scott Drake talks with Jordan Kimmel (Magnet Investment Group) about what future regulation might look like. Can you say "transparency"?