Monday, April 20, 2009
Robert Latham at New School Allowed Ethnic Albanian To Condone Genocide Against Serbian Orthodox Christians in Kosovo Posted 3/2/2009 2:37 PM EST
I couldn’t get the link right so read the scoop here -> Robert Latham at New School
Dear Friends: I have told this factual autobiographical account prior. However, this was during the height of NATO’s illegal war launched against Jugoslavija so I am unsure if this e-mail ever reached the entire audience for which it was intended. Hence, I am re-sending a brief account of whereby one United States University in New York City assisted Bill Clinton and Tony Blair in plotting, orchestrating, launching and perpetuating Albanian-KLA Nationalism and ethnic genocide directed against the Orthodox Christian Serbs in Kosovo. (See Attachment for formal proof).
I. It was in the Fall of 1997, my first semester in graduate school at the New School for Social Research when I noticed the bulletin on the wall that announced the Albanian Pro-KLA Nationalist Fatmos Ljubonia was going to give a lecture on Albanian Nationalism at the New School for Social Research in NYC (5th and 14th Streets in Wolffe Conference Room 2nd floor). This lecture was undoubtedly funded by the USIP and the WPI (the World Policy Institute resides on the fourth floor of the schools location).
II. Evidently, this particular lecture sparked my interest like none other owing to my serious commitment in following the various political & international trends regarding the Kosovo / Serbia & Bosnia wars and what would occur next. Therefore I made it my business to sit in on this lecture.
III. At that time, primarily the students attending this lecture and (it was a full house) were from parts of the world (like Asia) who knew nothing about Serbia and Kosovo. So they were very interested to hear what Fatmos Ljubonia had to say about the plight of the ethnic Albanians in Kosovo. There were only two graduate students who really knew what was going on in Kosovo at that time between the Albanians and the Serbs. (me and this Albanian student). I sat in for about 1 and 1/2 hours taking notes and listening. Then I left. Here is a short and brief description of the lecture.
IV. Primarily Fatmos at first attempted to elicit as much sympathy as humanly possible from the New School graduate students. He began the lecture by explaining that the Serbian government had imprisoned him for 20 years. and treated him in an inhumane manner. He did not explain why to us.
V. He quickly then shifted (to be blunt)–he spent the rest of his lecture lying to the (students) about the current situation in Kosovo. He supplied lies as answers to the students questions about Serbia, Albania and Kosovo and Fatmos completely bad-mouthed the Serbian government blaming it, for myriad human right violations not only committed against him (as he claimed) but also against him all ethnic Albanians in Kosovo.
VI. He completely this question and answer session quite pleased with himself since most of my classmates later indicated to me that they were shocked to hear about the conditions under which Fatmos claimed the ethnic Albanians were living under in Kosovo. I knew the man was a filthy liar but I could not say anything at the time. So he lied lied and he lied more!
VI. As I said I left early but I will never forget his phrase stating: “I, Fatmos Ljubonia, have come to the New School for Social Research to ask you, The New School students, to give me, Fatmos Ljubonia, new creative nationalist ideas to PROMOTE AND TO CONSTRUCT A GREATER ALBANIA!”
VII. Now there were a hell of a lot of New School faculty members also present who knew the truth about what really was going on between Serbia, the Western liberal think tanks at the New School for Social Research and their king, Bill Clinton regarding Kosovo. However, evidently these were the same political science professors such as David PLotke who later tossed me out of graduate school only three weeks prior my anticipated MA graduation date on April 22 1999 at knife point (we all know about my Civil Rights Case against the school
#02-99-2132.
VIII. I, Jill Starr have always stood up for the right political and social group, the Serbs of course. For it was not the Serbian authorities fault that NATO members and their corrupted politicians with a guilty as hell mens rea instigated and escalated the present ethnic contentions and genocide now occurring in Kosovo today!
XV. For this reason it does not surprise me that the semester before I was tossed out of school by POL SCI DEPT. CHAIR David Plotke, during my classes with the renown Robert Latham (from the SSRC in NYC) no one did anything when my Albanian classmate stated in front of many UN Diplomats that he 100% promoted “ethnic genocide against the Orthodox Christian Serbs in Kosovo!” Of course I reported the incident to both my human rights professor Adamantia Polllis and also the Dept. Chair David Plotke, yet neither of them did a damn thing!
What they did do is allow my Albanian classmate to continue going to school and graduate while they decided to throw me out of school and ruin my life to the best of their corrupt abilities!
X. The Albanian classmate of mine even said to me in front of Robert Latham’s entire class (FALL 1998) this to me when I said I’d like to see a copy of his paper which he said is written to promote ethnic genocide against Orthodox Christian Serbs in Kosovo this— />”Jill, you will surely die before you ever see my term paper!” The New School faculty threw me out and kept the genocidal Albanian on April 22 1999! See attachments!
PS: I’d like to give some lectures describing this experience in America to my friends in Serbia. David PLotke even came towards me with a swiss army knife!
Respectfully,
Miss Jill Louise Starr USA
PO BOX 635
Newfoundland NJ 07435 USA
(973) 850-7833
Post your own opinion for: ROBERT LATHAM
http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
Legal broadcast Network Senior Correspondent Sean Carter provides in depth analysis of the David Letterman extortion plot with Scott Drake.
Legal broadcast Network Senior Correspondent Sean Carter provides in depth analysis of the David Letterman extortion plot with Scott Drake.
(National law Journal) While the high-profile, Ted Olson- and David Boies-managed legal fight against California’s Proposition 8 captures headlines, a carefully planned case quietly underway in Massachusetts federal court could be the gay marriage test with the greatest national impact. The challenge, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, is one of four lawsuits in different parts of the country that ask federal courts to strike down all or parts of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The suits, and the Gill case in particular, according to advocates and scholars closely watching their progress, are just the opening shots in a struggle destined for the U.S. Supreme Court. Scott Drake interviews GLAD legal counsel Janson Wu who is part of the team leading the Gill case.
(National law Journal) While the high-profile, Ted Olson- and David Boies-managed legal fight against California’s Proposition 8 captures headlines, a carefully planned case quietly underway in Massachusetts federal court could be the gay marriage test with the greatest national impact. The challenge, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, is one of four lawsuits in different parts of the country that ask federal courts to strike down all or parts of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The suits, and the Gill case in particular, according to advocates and scholars closely watching their progress, are just the opening shots in a struggle destined for the U.S. Supreme Court. Scott Drake interviews GLAD legal counsel Janson Wu who is part of the team leading the Gill case.
Featured in this video is John Jensen discussing the case of CDOC vs The City of Los Angeles over the recently enacted spay and neuter regulations that many dog owners and breeders feel are over reaching, actually harmful to dogs and allow the state to intrude into the dog owners rights to own, breed and care for their animal.
David Frei of the Westminster Kennel Club, a long time dog breeder and advocate of responsible dog ownership discussing how mandatory spay and neuter laws can have unitended negative consequences on the dogs, responsible breeders and actually encourage “puppy mills” which is something breed clubs work to eliminate.
David Frei of the Westminster Kennel Club, a long time dog breeder and advocate of responsible dog ownership discussing how mandatory spay and neuter laws can have unitended negative consequences on the dogs, responsible breeders and actually encourage “puppy mills” which is something breed clubs work to eliminate.
Featured in this video is John Jensen discussing
the case of CDOC vs The City of Los Angeles over the recently enacted spay and neuter regulations that many dog owners and breeders feel are over reaching, actually harmful to dogs and allow the state to intrude into the dog owners rights to own, breed and care for their animal. This is an interesting constitutional legal issue and these video interviews outline this increasingly important case law as to the right of the state to regulate the ownership, breeding and control of dogs and cats nationally.
Dog regulations run amok? The CDOC vs The City of Los Angeles.
No area of the law or regulation creates more controversy and passion then anything linked to dogs, cats and other domestic pets and the lawsuit brought by Concerned Dog Owners of California (CDOC) against the City of Los Angeles over their mandatory spay and neuter regulations is no exception. Last year they filed a lawsuit to over turn the mandatory spay and neuter regulations imposed on all dog owners in the City, in which set dates for spay and neuter are established, civil and administrative penalties are outlined and entire categories of dog breeders, owners and hobbyists now fall under increasingly strict laws and oversight.
In this interview Scott Drake Interviews chairperson of Concerned Dog Owners of California Cathie Turner
Scott and David Frei for CDOC talk on legal broadcast network
Supreme Court Justice David Souter has announced he plans to retire from the bench at the end of this year's term.
Scott Drake Talks with Slate's senior legal correspondent Dahlia Lithwick about possible replacements...including many women.
Scott Drake talks with David Frederick who represented Diana Levine in the Wyeth Supreme Court case. Frederick talks about how the case was won and the challenges of arguing before the Supreme Court.
David C. Frederick has argued twenty-six cases in the Supreme Court of the United States, including nine in the past three Terms.
The US Supreme Court heard arguments on a question central to the criminal justice system: When new methods of DNA analysis could exonerate a person, does the individual have the right to access the physical evidence for testing? University of Pennsylvania law prof. David Rudovsky discusses the William Osborne case with Scott Drake.
Scott Drake talks with David Frederick who represented Diana Levine in the Wyeth Supreme Court case. Frederick talks about how the case was won and the challenges of arguing before the Supreme Court.
David C. Frederick has argued twenty-six cases in the Supreme Court of the United States, including nine in the past three Terms.