http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/searchEverything.kickAction?as=80539&mediaType=blog&sortType=recent All new blogs on fox29 Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:58:56 GMT Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:58:56 GMT WTXF_Web@foxtv.com (MyFoxPhilly) WTXF_Web@foxtv.com (MyFoxPhilly) KickApps Feed Builder 2009-11-22T18:58:56Z 1000 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/searchEverything.kickAction?as=80539&sortType=recent 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Think-outside-the-box/BLOG/1507591/80539.html Why are both sides of the media spending so much time with a procedural vote on health care? Because they were told not to give attention to the other much more far reaching vote that took place this week. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. congressional panel on Thursday approved a measure to open the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions to government audits, a surprise blow to the central bank's efforts to shield its independence and a signal of frustration with the central bank.The provision, co-sponsored by Republican Representative Ron Paul and Democrat Alan Grayson, would allow a congressional watchdog agency to conduct a broad review of the U.S. central bank's policy and lending. Fed officials have strongly opposed it, saying it would cast doubt on the central bank's independence from political pressure.The House of Representatives Financial Services Committee approved the amendment to broader legislation to revamp financial rules. The panel put off a vote on the broader measure.House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, who opposed the Paul-Grayson measure, predicted it would be revisited when financial reform legislation is debated by the House."I think it's going to be seen as weakening the independence of monetary policy with consequent negative implications," he told reporters after the vote. "I think people will be worried about the impact on the dollar and on interest rates, and I think that one may be revisited when we get to the floor."However, Paul's measure has earned support from more than half of the members of the House.The amendment is a further congressional slap at the U.S. central bank after a Senate regulatory overhaul proposed stripping the Fed of its regulatory authority. Some lawmakers fault the Fed for failing to anticipate or prevent the financial crisis that pitched the economy into deep recession, while others are angry at its extensive emergency support for financial institutions.The Fed objected to the provision, saying it could raise financial market questions about its independence and could result in higher long-term interest rates as investors worry about inflation risks."History provides numerous examples of non-independent central banks being forced to finance large government budget deficits," Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in July. "Such episodes invariably lead to high inflation."Paul is an outlier in U.S. politics who advocated abolishing the U.S. central bank well before the financial crisis. He ran for president as a Republican in 2008 and recently published a book called "End the Fed."However, the Texas lawmaker was able to tap into widespread congressional frustration with the Fed."The Fed currently has no political capital," conceded Representative Mel Watt, a Democrat who opposed the Paul-Grayson provision. "Everybody would like to beat up on the Fed and call them the bad guy," Watt said. "(But) are we going to so substantially castrate the Fed so it cannot do what it was set up to do?"Watt had promoted a compromise amendment that would have allowed audits of the Fed's balance sheet and lending but would have drawn a clear line at leaving monetary policy alone. Frank, the committee chairman, backed Watt's proposal.A Fed representative declined to comment on the vote, and cited earlier comments from senior Fed officials expressing concern that monetary policy audits would undermine the central bank's independence.   Why are both sides of the media spending so much time with a procedural vote on health care? Because they were told not to give attention to the other much more far reaching vote that took place this week. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. congressional panel on Thursday approved a measure to open the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions to government audits, a surprise blow to the central bank's efforts to shield its independence and a signal of frustration with the central bank.The provision, co-sponsored by Republican Representative Ron Paul and Democrat Alan Grayson, would allow a congressional watchdog agency to conduct a broad review of the U.S. central bank's policy and lending. Fed officials have strongly opposed it, saying it would cast doubt on the central bank's independence from political pressure.The House of Representatives Financial Services Committee approved the amendment to broader legislation to revamp financial rules. The panel put off a vote on the broader measure.House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, who opposed the Paul-Grayson measure, predicted it would be revisited when financial reform legislation is debated by the House."I think it's going to be seen as weakening the independence of monetary policy with consequent negative implications," he told reporters after the vote. "I think people will be worried about the impact on the dollar and on interest rates, and I think that one may be revisited when we get to the floor."However, Paul's measure has earned support from more than half of the members of the House.The amendment is a further congressional slap at the U.S. central bank after a Senate regulatory overhaul proposed stripping the Fed of its regulatory authority. Some lawmakers fault the Fed for failing to anticipate or prevent the financial crisis that pitched the economy into deep recession, while others are angry at its extensive emergency support for financial institutions.The Fed objected to the provision, saying it could raise financial market questions about its independence and could result in higher long-term interest rates as investors worry about inflation risks."History provides numerous examples of non-independent central banks being forced to finance large government budget deficits," Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in July. "Such episodes invariably lead to high inflation."Paul is an outlier in U.S. politics who advocated abolishing the U.S. central bank well before the financial crisis. He ran for president as a Republican in 2008 and recently published a book called "End the Fed."However, the Texas lawmaker was able to tap into widespread congressional frustration with the Fed."The Fed currently has no political capital," conceded Representative Mel Watt, a Democrat who opposed the Paul-Grayson provision. "Everybody would like to beat up on the Fed and call them the bad guy," Watt said. "(But) are we going to so substantially castrate the Fed so it cannot do what it was set up to do?"Watt had promoted a compromise amendment that would have allowed audits of the Fed's balance sheet and lending but would have drawn a clear line at leaving monetary policy alone. Frank, the committee chairman, backed Watt's proposal.A Fed representative declined to comment on the vote, and cited earlier comments from senior Fed officials expressing concern that monetary policy audits would undermine the central bank's independence.   Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:58:56 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Think-outside-the-box/BLOG/1507591/80539.html DeweyDevil 2009-11-22T18:58:56Z fox29 Why are both sides of the media spending so much time with a procedural vote on health care? Because they were told not to give attention to the other much more far reaching vote that took place this week. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. congressional panel on Thursday approved a measure to open the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions to government audits, a surprise blow to the central bank's efforts to shield its independence and a signal of frustration with the central bank.The provision, co-sponsored by Republican Representative Ron Paul and Democrat Alan Grayson, would allow a congressional watchdog agency to conduct a broad review of the U.S. central bank's policy and lending. Fed officials have strongly opposed it, saying it would cast doubt on the central bank's independence from political pressure.The House of Representatives Financial Services Committee approved the amendment to broader legislation to revamp financial rules. The panel put off a vote on the broader measure.House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, who opposed the Paul-Grayson measure, predicted it would be revisited when financial reform legislation is debated by the House."I think it's going to be seen as weakening the independence of monetary policy with consequent negative implications," he told reporters after the vote. "I think people will be worried about the impact on the dollar and on interest rates, and I think that one may be revisited when we get to the floor."However, Paul's measure has earned support from more than half of the members of the House.The amendment is a further congressional slap at the U.S. central bank after a Senate regulatory overhaul proposed stripping the Fed of its regulatory authority. Some lawmakers fault the Fed for failing to anticipate or prevent the financial crisis that pitched the economy into deep recession, while others are angry at its extensive emergency support for financial institutions.The Fed objected to the provision, saying it could raise financial market questions about its independence and could result in higher long-term interest rates as investors worry about inflation risks."History provides numerous examples of non-independent central banks being forced to finance large government budget deficits," Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in July. "Such episodes invariably lead to high inflation."Paul is an outlier in U.S. politics who advocated abolishing the U.S. central bank well before the financial crisis. He ran for president as a Republican in 2008 and recently published a book called "End the Fed."However, the Texas lawmaker was able to tap into widespread congressional frustration with the Fed."The Fed currently has no political capital," conceded Representative Mel Watt, a Democrat who opposed the Paul-Grayson provision. "Everybody would like to beat up on the Fed and call them the bad guy," Watt said. "(But) are we going to so substantially castrate the Fed so it cannot do what it was set up to do?"Watt had promoted a compromise amendment that would have allowed audits of the Fed's balance sheet and lending but would have drawn a clear line at leaving monetary policy alone. Frank, the committee chairman, backed Watt's proposal.A Fed representative declined to comment on the vote, and cited earlier comments from senior Fed officials expressing concern that monetary policy audits would undermine the central bank's independence.   nonadult false Think outside the box.... text blog 11 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4704978&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_5257680_80539_4704978_ap_160X120.jpg false 1 0 1507591 4704978 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Start-the-RACE-/BLOG/1507473/80539.html "Drivers, Start Your Engines!"[image] "Drivers, Start Your Engines!"[image] Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:43:45 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Start-the-RACE-/BLOG/1507473/80539.html starrman1 2009-11-22T16:43:45Z fox29 "Drivers, Start Your Engines!"[image] nonadult false Start the RACE ! text blog 7 2 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4887428&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_4584489_80539_4887428_ap_160X120.jpg false 2 0 1507473 4887428 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Obama-Excels-at-ONE-thing/BLOG/1507320/80539.html Obama Excels at ONE Thing: Blaming OthersHome - by SnarkandBoobs - November 21, 2009 - 13:58 America/Chicago -  He’s also quite adept at that whole throwing people under the bus deal.  Eric Holder is the latest to bear tread marks.So now Obama would have us believe that he wasn’t even consulted on the KSM trial venue? Huh. Either he is a consummate liar or he is so incompetent that even his underlings don’t consult with him. In fact, they make decisions without even informing him!And the Left always claimed that Bush was a puppet — looks like they were projecting once again. Well, if nothing else, Obama is big on catch phrases. Here is one phrase that it would behoove him to learn:The Buck Stops Here.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W50Fxr1b-I8 Obama Excels at ONE Thing: Blaming OthersHome - by SnarkandBoobs - November 21, 2009 - 13:58 America/Chicago -  He’s also quite adept at that whole throwing people under the bus deal.  Eric Holder is the latest to bear tread marks.So now Obama would have us believe that he wasn’t even consulted on the KSM trial venue? Huh. Either he is a consummate liar or he is so incompetent that even his underlings don’t consult with him. In fact, they make decisions without even informing him!And the Left always claimed that Bush was a puppet — looks like they were projecting once again. Well, if nothing else, Obama is big on catch phrases. Here is one phrase that it would behoove him to learn:The Buck Stops Here.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W50Fxr1b-I8 Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:31:55 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Obama-Excels-at-ONE-thing/BLOG/1507320/80539.html PUBLIUS 2009-11-22T13:31:55Z fox29 Obama Excels at ONE Thing: Blaming OthersHome - by SnarkandBoobs - November 21, 2009 - 13:58 America/Chicago -  He’s also quite adept at that whole throwing people under the bus deal.  Eric Holder is the latest to bear tread marks.So now Obama would have us believe that he wasn’t even consulted on the KSM trial venue? Huh. Either he is a consummate liar or he is so incompetent that even his underlings don’t consult with him. In fact, they make decisions without even informing him!And the Left always claimed that Bush was a puppet — looks like they were projecting once again. Well, if nothing else, Obama is big on catch phrases. Here is one phrase that it would behoove him to learn:The Buck Stops Here.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W50Fxr1b-I8 nonadult false Obama Excels at ONE thing: text blog 14 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=10727756&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_5023242_80539_10727756_ap_160X120.jpg false 2 0 1507320 10727756 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Vide-cor-Meum/BLOG/1507312/80539.html The face and voice of an angle...Sarah Brightman....ENJOY.  There IS a God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74_5O0xrMvw&feature=related The face and voice of an angle...Sarah Brightman....ENJOY.  There IS a God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74_5O0xrMvw&feature=related Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:07:21 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Vide-cor-Meum/BLOG/1507312/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-22T13:07:21Z fox29 The face and voice of an angle...Sarah Brightman....ENJOY.  There IS a God. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74_5O0xrMvw&feature=related nonadult false Vide cor Meum text blog 14 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 1 0 1507312 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Cloture-passes-60-39/BLOG/1507299/80539.html The Senate Cloture Bill passed the Senate last night (Nov.21) by a vote of 60-39.November 21, 2009Healthcare disaster loomsJames SimpsonThis Congress is beneath contempt. What they are poised to pass today -- yes I know this is just a procedural vote, but everything turns on it -- is an abomination. Since Lincoln and Landrieu have been bought off it is now sure to pass. Landrieu's vote will cost the taxpayers $100 million. I wonder what we paid Lincoln to betray us? This bill will not merely ruin our healthcare system; it will impose economy-crushing taxes, pushing our already tottering economy ever closer to the abyss. No surprise there. Candidate Obama said that since we are only 4 percent of the world population, we couldn't go on consuming 25 percent of the world's resources. It's not fair. In his worldview we should only be consuming, what, 4 percent? In his mind we are confiscating resources and need to give them back. How stupid can a person be? It is not a zero sum game! We don't consume 25 percent of the world's resources; we trade 25 percent of the world's resources, (if that figure is even correct. I suspect it is high. But some on the left claim 40, 50, even 75 percent - they are delusional.) In any event, the world should be glad we are here, for we are the world's consumer market. We support the world economy. Without that support the world will plunge into a depression that will make 1933 look like a walk in the park! A good, brief explanation of why that is, here.As it is, taxes proposed to pay for this bill will be onerous, but at $849 billion over ten years, the bill radically underestimates cost. The Senate Budget Committee estimated the true cost at $2.5 trillion. But even this is a vast underestimate because they implicitly assume the legislation will remain unchanged. This will not happen. It has never, ever happened! After the bill passes, Congress will add all kinds of bells and whistles, and will add more "fixes" as the problems created by the new programs begin to manifest themselves. So think of the Senate Budget Committee's $2.5 trillion 10 year cost as a bare bones, no further changes, minimum. Medicare provides a good example. From a modest $16 billion spending in its first year, Medicare increased 231% over the next nine years, an average annual program growth of 12.72%. This is after correcting for inflation! I do not believe this new bill even factors in inflation over the 10-year period. If you look at Medicare from its first year to the tenth w/o correcting for inflation, it grew 434% or 18.24% per year! These data are derived from program outlay figures provided by the White House Office of Management and Budget - unassailable. Here is another way to look at it. Medicare and Medicaid together cost $656 billion in 2008, the last year for which actual data are available. The total number of people enrolled in these two programs is about 88 million people -- yes that's right folks we are paying medical bills for approximately thirty percent of the population already! This comes out to about $7,500 per enrollee per year.This bill is going to generously allow us to pay for 47 million more. Forget about denying illegals, they will be covered in this legislation. Don't believe a word about "cost savings." It is not going to happen, even if they do start euthanizing granny. Medicare and Medicaid currently squeeze everything they can out of the medical profession and their cost cutting measures are already creating supply shortages. So consider $7,500 a reasonable estimate of per capita cost. Assuming this same average cost for all these new folks gets us an annual price tag of about $350 billion, ($7,500 x 47 million) or a ten year cost of $3.5 trillion.Now, Congress has never in the history of major legislation, ever left it alone once passed. It will explode just like Medicare and Medicaid have throughout their entire existence - and Congress gave us the exact same phony promises back when these programs were first proposed. So take the $3.5 trillion and multiply it by a factor of 3, i.e. $10 trillion, or an average annual cost of $1 trillion, and you are probably closer to a realistic minimum cost figure.This bill is a five-alarm fire that will consume our nation if it passes.Businessman and Examiner.com columnist Jim Simpson is a former White House staff economist and budget analyst. You may read more of his articles on his blog, Truth and Consequences.  The Senate Cloture Bill passed the Senate last night (Nov.21) by a vote of 60-39.November 21, 2009Healthcare disaster loomsJames SimpsonThis Congress is beneath contempt. What they are poised to pass today -- yes I know this is just a procedural vote, but everything turns on it -- is an abomination. Since Lincoln and Landrieu have been bought off it is now sure to pass. Landrieu's vote will cost the taxpayers $100 million. I wonder what we paid Lincoln to betray us? This bill will not merely ruin our healthcare system; it will impose economy-crushing taxes, pushing our already tottering economy ever closer to the abyss. No surprise there. Candidate Obama said that since we are only 4 percent of the world population, we couldn't go on consuming 25 percent of the world's resources. It's not fair. In his worldview we should only be consuming, what, 4 percent? In his mind we are confiscating resources and need to give them back. How stupid can a person be? It is not a zero sum game! We don't consume 25 percent of the world's resources; we trade 25 percent of the world's resources, (if that figure is even correct. I suspect it is high. But some on the left claim 40, 50, even 75 percent - they are delusional.) In any event, the world should be glad we are here, for we are the world's consumer market. We support the world economy. Without that support the world will plunge into a depression that will make 1933 look like a walk in the park! A good, brief explanation of why that is, here.As it is, taxes proposed to pay for this bill will be onerous, but at $849 billion over ten years, the bill radically underestimates cost. The Senate Budget Committee estimated the true cost at $2.5 trillion. But even this is a vast underestimate because they implicitly assume the legislation will remain unchanged. This will not happen. It has never, ever happened! After the bill passes, Congress will add all kinds of bells and whistles, and will add more "fixes" as the problems created by the new programs begin to manifest themselves. So think of the Senate Budget Committee's $2.5 trillion 10 year cost as a bare bones, no further changes, minimum. Medicare provides a good example. From a modest $16 billion spending in its first year, Medicare increased 231% over the next nine years, an average annual program growth of 12.72%. This is after correcting for inflation! I do not believe this new bill even factors in inflation over the 10-year period. If you look at Medicare from its first year to the tenth w/o correcting for inflation, it grew 434% or 18.24% per year! These data are derived from program outlay figures provided by the White House Office of Management and Budget - unassailable. Here is another way to look at it. Medicare and Medicaid together cost $656 billion in 2008, the last year for which actual data are available. The total number of people enrolled in these two programs is about 88 million people -- yes that's right folks we are paying medical bills for approximately thirty percent of the population already! This comes out to about $7,500 per enrollee per year.This bill is going to generously allow us to pay for 47 million more. Forget about denying illegals, they will be covered in this legislation. Don't believe a word about "cost savings." It is not going to happen, even if they do start euthanizing granny. Medicare and Medicaid currently squeeze everything they can out of the medical profession and their cost cutting measures are already creating supply shortages. So consider $7,500 a reasonable estimate of per capita cost. Assuming this same average cost for all these new folks gets us an annual price tag of about $350 billion, ($7,500 x 47 million) or a ten year cost of $3.5 trillion.Now, Congress has never in the history of major legislation, ever left it alone once passed. It will explode just like Medicare and Medicaid have throughout their entire existence - and Congress gave us the exact same phony promises back when these programs were first proposed. So take the $3.5 trillion and multiply it by a factor of 3, i.e. $10 trillion, or an average annual cost of $1 trillion, and you are probably closer to a realistic minimum cost figure.This bill is a five-alarm fire that will consume our nation if it passes.Businessman and Examiner.com columnist Jim Simpson is a former White House staff economist and budget analyst. You may read more of his articles on his blog, Truth and Consequences.  Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:39:10 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Cloture-passes-60-39/BLOG/1507299/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-22T12:39:10Z fox29 The Senate Cloture Bill passed the Senate last night (Nov.21) by a vote of 60-39.November 21, 2009Healthcare disaster loomsJames SimpsonThis Congress is beneath contempt. What they are poised to pass today -- yes I know this is just a procedural vote, but everything turns on it -- is an abomination. Since Lincoln and Landrieu have been bought off it is now sure to pass. Landrieu's vote will cost the taxpayers $100 million. I wonder what we paid Lincoln to betray us? This bill will not merely ruin our healthcare system; it will impose economy-crushing taxes, pushing our already tottering economy ever closer to the abyss. No surprise there. Candidate Obama said that since we are only 4 percent of the world population, we couldn't go on consuming 25 percent of the world's resources. It's not fair. In his worldview we should only be consuming, what, 4 percent? In his mind we are confiscating resources and need to give them back. How stupid can a person be? It is not a zero sum game! We don't consume 25 percent of the world's resources; we trade 25 percent of the world's resources, (if that figure is even correct. I suspect it is high. But some on the left claim 40, 50, even 75 percent - they are delusional.) In any event, the world should be glad we are here, for we are the world's consumer market. We support the world economy. Without that support the world will plunge into a depression that will make 1933 look like a walk in the park! A good, brief explanation of why that is, here.As it is, taxes proposed to pay for this bill will be onerous, but at $849 billion over ten years, the bill radically underestimates cost. The Senate Budget Committee estimated the true cost at $2.5 trillion. But even this is a vast underestimate because they implicitly assume the legislation will remain unchanged. This will not happen. It has never, ever happened! After the bill passes, Congress will add all kinds of bells and whistles, and will add more "fixes" as the problems created by the new programs begin to manifest themselves. So think of the Senate Budget Committee's $2.5 trillion 10 year cost as a bare bones, no further changes, minimum. Medicare provides a good example. From a modest $16 billion spending in its first year, Medicare increased 231% over the next nine years, an average annual program growth of 12.72%. This is after correcting for inflation! I do not believe this new bill even factors in inflation over the 10-year period. If you look at Medicare from its first year to the tenth w/o correcting for inflation, it grew 434% or 18.24% per year! These data are derived from program outlay figures provided by the White House Office of Management and Budget - unassailable. Here is another way to look at it. Medicare and Medicaid together cost $656 billion in 2008, the last year for which actual data are available. The total number of people enrolled in these two programs is about 88 million people -- yes that's right folks we are paying medical bills for approximately thirty percent of the population already! This comes out to about $7,500 per enrollee per year.This bill is going to generously allow us to pay for 47 million more. Forget about denying illegals, they will be covered in this legislation. Don't believe a word about "cost savings." It is not going to happen, even if they do start euthanizing granny. Medicare and Medicaid currently squeeze everything they can out of the medical profession and their cost cutting measures are already creating supply shortages. So consider $7,500 a reasonable estimate of per capita cost. Assuming this same average cost for all these new folks gets us an annual price tag of about $350 billion, ($7,500 x 47 million) or a ten year cost of $3.5 trillion.Now, Congress has never in the history of major legislation, ever left it alone once passed. It will explode just like Medicare and Medicaid have throughout their entire existence - and Congress gave us the exact same phony promises back when these programs were first proposed. So take the $3.5 trillion and multiply it by a factor of 3, i.e. $10 trillion, or an average annual cost of $1 trillion, and you are probably closer to a realistic minimum cost figure.This bill is a five-alarm fire that will consume our nation if it passes.Businessman and Examiner.com columnist Jim Simpson is a former White House staff economist and budget analyst. You may read more of his articles on his blog, Truth and Consequences.  nonadult false Cloture passes 60-39 text blog 21 2 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 6 0 1507299 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_PUN-OF-THE-DAY/BLOG/1507253/80539.html HE DROVE HIS EXPENSIVE CAR INTO A TREE AND FOUND OUT HOW THE  MERCEDES BENDS. HE DROVE HIS EXPENSIVE CAR INTO A TREE AND FOUND OUT HOW THE  MERCEDES BENDS. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:38:43 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_PUN-OF-THE-DAY/BLOG/1507253/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-22T09:38:43Z fox29 HE DROVE HIS EXPENSIVE CAR INTO A TREE AND FOUND OUT HOW THE  MERCEDES BENDS. nonadult false PUN OF THE DAY text blog 17 2 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 2 0 1507253 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Calmness-Inner-Peace/BLOG/1506963/80539.html An oldie, but it still works!If you waste your hard earned money on tranquilizers or shrinks, try this instead:CALMNESS IN OUR DAILY LIVES. I am passing this on to you because it definitely works, and we could all use a little more calmness and inner peace in our lives. By following a simple advice heard on the Dr. Oz show, you too can find inner peace.  The great Dr. Oz proclaimed, "The way to achieve inner peace is to finish all the things you have started and have never finished."I looked around my house to see all of the things I had started and had not finished, and before leaving the house this morning; I finished off a bottle of Zinfandel, a bottle of Tequila, a package of Oreos, the remainder of my old Prozac prescription, the rest of the cheesecake, some Doritos, and a box of chocolates.You have no idea how freaking good I feel right now!Please feel free to pass this message on to those whom you think might be in need of some ‘inner peace.’ An oldie, but it still works!If you waste your hard earned money on tranquilizers or shrinks, try this instead:CALMNESS IN OUR DAILY LIVES. I am passing this on to you because it definitely works, and we could all use a little more calmness and inner peace in our lives. By following a simple advice heard on the Dr. Oz show, you too can find inner peace.  The great Dr. Oz proclaimed, "The way to achieve inner peace is to finish all the things you have started and have never finished."I looked around my house to see all of the things I had started and had not finished, and before leaving the house this morning; I finished off a bottle of Zinfandel, a bottle of Tequila, a package of Oreos, the remainder of my old Prozac prescription, the rest of the cheesecake, some Doritos, and a box of chocolates.You have no idea how freaking good I feel right now!Please feel free to pass this message on to those whom you think might be in need of some ‘inner peace.’ Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:48:44 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Calmness-Inner-Peace/BLOG/1506963/80539.html starrman1 2009-11-21T23:48:44Z fox29 An oldie, but it still works!If you waste your hard earned money on tranquilizers or shrinks, try this instead:CALMNESS IN OUR DAILY LIVES. I am passing this on to you because it definitely works, and we could all use a little more calmness and inner peace in our lives. By following a simple advice heard on the Dr. Oz show, you too can find inner peace.  The great Dr. Oz proclaimed, "The way to achieve inner peace is to finish all the things you have started and have never finished."I looked around my house to see all of the things I had started and had not finished, and before leaving the house this morning; I finished off a bottle of Zinfandel, a bottle of Tequila, a package of Oreos, the remainder of my old Prozac prescription, the rest of the cheesecake, some Doritos, and a box of chocolates.You have no idea how freaking good I feel right now!Please feel free to pass this message on to those whom you think might be in need of some ‘inner peace.’ nonadult false Calmness & Inner Peace text blog 15 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4887428&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_4584489_80539_4887428_ap_160X120.jpg false 0 0 1506963 4887428 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Lindsey-Graham-destroys-Eric-Holder/BLOG/1506823/80539.html Sen. Lindsey Graham is far from my favorite Republican. He’s somewhere below Kit Bond.  But sometimes he’s a top notch member of the team.He took Attorney General Eric Holder to task for his decision to bring terrorists off the battlefield and give them Constitutional rights in a federal court.He’s fantastic here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG7lm8Sfbo4 Sen. Lindsey Graham is far from my favorite Republican. He’s somewhere below Kit Bond.  But sometimes he’s a top notch member of the team.He took Attorney General Eric Holder to task for his decision to bring terrorists off the battlefield and give them Constitutional rights in a federal court.He’s fantastic here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG7lm8Sfbo4 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:33:07 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Lindsey-Graham-destroys-Eric-Holder/BLOG/1506823/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-21T20:33:07Z fox29 Sen. Lindsey Graham is far from my favorite Republican. He’s somewhere below Kit Bond.  But sometimes he’s a top notch member of the team.He took Attorney General Eric Holder to task for his decision to bring terrorists off the battlefield and give them Constitutional rights in a federal court.He’s fantastic here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG7lm8Sfbo4 nonadult false Lindsey Graham destroys Eric Holder text blog 16 3 3.6666667 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 1 0 1506823 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Trying-Bush/BLOG/1506487/80539.html The best political cartoon I've ever seen;http://townhall.com/cartoons/cartoonist/GlennMcCoyHolder's True Motive by Mona Charen [image]Attorney General Eric Holder adopted a tough guy pose when he announced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others will be tried in federal court for the most heinous terror attack on Americans in history. "After eight years of delay," he intoned, "those allegedly responsible for the attacks of September 11 will finally face justice. It is past time to finally act."Where to begin? The claim that the Bush administration was somehow dilatory sets a new standard for gall, particularly coming from Eric Holder. As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy points out, "The principal reason there were so few military trials is the tireless campaign conducted by leftist lawyers (including Holder) to derail military tribunals by challenging them in the courts."Those lawyers threw up hundreds of roadblocks. Military detentions and tribunals violated, they claimed, the U.S. Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Litigating all this has taken years.At last clearing those obstacles, the government initiated Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's military trial in Guantanamo in September 2008. In December, KSM pleaded guilty and asked to be executed.But now, the attorney general puffs out his chest and declares that by trying KSM in an Article III federal court, he has chosen the forum "most likely to lead to a positive result."The mind reels.This is an excruciatingly awful decision that no hanging judge talk of "the ultimate penalty" can perfume. What about the increased risk of terror attacks on New York during the trial? The city is "hardened" against attacks Holder assures us. Really? Like Fort Hood?By granting a civil trial to KSM, while Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who bombed the USS Cole in Yemen, will receive a military tribunal, the U.S. telegraphs this message to terrorists: Wherever possible, attack our civilians. You'll get more lawyering and a better deal than if you attack our military. (And by the way, you'll get more rights than a member of our military who commits a crime.)Attorney General Holder is keen to prove to a supposedly skeptical world that America lives up to its values (never mind that granting the full rights of citizens to enemy combatants is not part of our creed -- nor anyone else's). Yet he has also repeatedly asserted that a not-guilty verdict is unacceptable. "Failure is not an option. These are cases that have to be won." Whoa. In the first place, it isn't at all beyond imagination that the government could lose this case. KSM was waterboarded. No evidence thus obtained is admissible. A liberal judge who disliked the Bush administration might exclude other key evidence as well.But Holder says he'll be found guilty. Isn't that a perversion of our jurisprudence? If a not-guilty verdict is impossible, then the trial is a sham. "Sentence first -- verdict afterward" said the Red Queen.Moreover, the Justice Department has assured Sen. Jon Kyl that "we will not release anyone into the United States if doing so would endanger our national security or the American people." So in the event that KSM is acquitted, it's the position of the Obama Justice Department that we would continue to hold him? How does that outcome burnish the reputation of our justice system?And while we're on the subject of not thinking things through, at a Senate hearing, Holder could not answer Sen. Lindsey Graham's question about how we would deal with Osama bin Laden if we caught him tomorrow. Would he be Mirandized? Would we give him a lawyer? Isn't that the precedent this decision sets?There are dozens more reasons (including the intelligence bonanza this will confer on al-Qaida) that this decision is among the worst to emerge from a terrible presidency. What did they hope to achieve? Perhaps they have thought it through -- at least as far as how the trial would unfold. With no defense (he has boasted about his mass murder), what will KSM do? He will put the CIA and the Bush administration on trial. Prepare for lurid accounts of his and others' mistreatment.Is that the nub? To satisfy the revenge fantasies of American leftists who have lusted to put the Bush administration on trial, the Obama administration is willing to sacrifice logic, justice, national security, and honor?When KSM's star turn in the courtroom goes viral on the Internet and inspires thousands of new jihadis, the Obamaites can console themselves that at least they stuck it to George W. Bush.http://townhall.com/columnists/MonaCharen/2009/11/20/holders_true_motive The best political cartoon I've ever seen;http://townhall.com/cartoons/cartoonist/GlennMcCoyHolder's True Motive by Mona Charen [image]Attorney General Eric Holder adopted a tough guy pose when he announced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others will be tried in federal court for the most heinous terror attack on Americans in history. "After eight years of delay," he intoned, "those allegedly responsible for the attacks of September 11 will finally face justice. It is past time to finally act."Where to begin? The claim that the Bush administration was somehow dilatory sets a new standard for gall, particularly coming from Eric Holder. As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy points out, "The principal reason there were so few military trials is the tireless campaign conducted by leftist lawyers (including Holder) to derail military tribunals by challenging them in the courts."Those lawyers threw up hundreds of roadblocks. Military detentions and tribunals violated, they claimed, the U.S. Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Litigating all this has taken years.At last clearing those obstacles, the government initiated Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's military trial in Guantanamo in September 2008. In December, KSM pleaded guilty and asked to be executed.But now, the attorney general puffs out his chest and declares that by trying KSM in an Article III federal court, he has chosen the forum "most likely to lead to a positive result."The mind reels.This is an excruciatingly awful decision that no hanging judge talk of "the ultimate penalty" can perfume. What about the increased risk of terror attacks on New York during the trial? The city is "hardened" against attacks Holder assures us. Really? Like Fort Hood?By granting a civil trial to KSM, while Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who bombed the USS Cole in Yemen, will receive a military tribunal, the U.S. telegraphs this message to terrorists: Wherever possible, attack our civilians. You'll get more lawyering and a better deal than if you attack our military. (And by the way, you'll get more rights than a member of our military who commits a crime.)Attorney General Holder is keen to prove to a supposedly skeptical world that America lives up to its values (never mind that granting the full rights of citizens to enemy combatants is not part of our creed -- nor anyone else's). Yet he has also repeatedly asserted that a not-guilty verdict is unacceptable. "Failure is not an option. These are cases that have to be won." Whoa. In the first place, it isn't at all beyond imagination that the government could lose this case. KSM was waterboarded. No evidence thus obtained is admissible. A liberal judge who disliked the Bush administration might exclude other key evidence as well.But Holder says he'll be found guilty. Isn't that a perversion of our jurisprudence? If a not-guilty verdict is impossible, then the trial is a sham. "Sentence first -- verdict afterward" said the Red Queen.Moreover, the Justice Department has assured Sen. Jon Kyl that "we will not release anyone into the United States if doing so would endanger our national security or the American people." So in the event that KSM is acquitted, it's the position of the Obama Justice Department that we would continue to hold him? How does that outcome burnish the reputation of our justice system?And while we're on the subject of not thinking things through, at a Senate hearing, Holder could not answer Sen. Lindsey Graham's question about how we would deal with Osama bin Laden if we caught him tomorrow. Would he be Mirandized? Would we give him a lawyer? Isn't that the precedent this decision sets?There are dozens more reasons (including the intelligence bonanza this will confer on al-Qaida) that this decision is among the worst to emerge from a terrible presidency. What did they hope to achieve? Perhaps they have thought it through -- at least as far as how the trial would unfold. With no defense (he has boasted about his mass murder), what will KSM do? He will put the CIA and the Bush administration on trial. Prepare for lurid accounts of his and others' mistreatment.Is that the nub? To satisfy the revenge fantasies of American leftists who have lusted to put the Bush administration on trial, the Obama administration is willing to sacrifice logic, justice, national security, and honor?When KSM's star turn in the courtroom goes viral on the Internet and inspires thousands of new jihadis, the Obamaites can console themselves that at least they stuck it to George W. Bush.http://townhall.com/columnists/MonaCharen/2009/11/20/holders_true_motive Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:42:02 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Trying-Bush/BLOG/1506487/80539.html movealready 2009-11-21T14:42:02Z fox29 The best political cartoon I've ever seen;http://townhall.com/cartoons/cartoonist/GlennMcCoyHolder's True Motive by Mona Charen [image]Attorney General Eric Holder adopted a tough guy pose when he announced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others will be tried in federal court for the most heinous terror attack on Americans in history. "After eight years of delay," he intoned, "those allegedly responsible for the attacks of September 11 will finally face justice. It is past time to finally act."Where to begin? The claim that the Bush administration was somehow dilatory sets a new standard for gall, particularly coming from Eric Holder. As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy points out, "The principal reason there were so few military trials is the tireless campaign conducted by leftist lawyers (including Holder) to derail military tribunals by challenging them in the courts."Those lawyers threw up hundreds of roadblocks. Military detentions and tribunals violated, they claimed, the U.S. Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Litigating all this has taken years.At last clearing those obstacles, the government initiated Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's military trial in Guantanamo in September 2008. In December, KSM pleaded guilty and asked to be executed.But now, the attorney general puffs out his chest and declares that by trying KSM in an Article III federal court, he has chosen the forum "most likely to lead to a positive result."The mind reels.This is an excruciatingly awful decision that no hanging judge talk of "the ultimate penalty" can perfume. What about the increased risk of terror attacks on New York during the trial? The city is "hardened" against attacks Holder assures us. Really? Like Fort Hood?By granting a civil trial to KSM, while Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who bombed the USS Cole in Yemen, will receive a military tribunal, the U.S. telegraphs this message to terrorists: Wherever possible, attack our civilians. You'll get more lawyering and a better deal than if you attack our military. (And by the way, you'll get more rights than a member of our military who commits a crime.)Attorney General Holder is keen to prove to a supposedly skeptical world that America lives up to its values (never mind that granting the full rights of citizens to enemy combatants is not part of our creed -- nor anyone else's). Yet he has also repeatedly asserted that a not-guilty verdict is unacceptable. "Failure is not an option. These are cases that have to be won." Whoa. In the first place, it isn't at all beyond imagination that the government could lose this case. KSM was waterboarded. No evidence thus obtained is admissible. A liberal judge who disliked the Bush administration might exclude other key evidence as well.But Holder says he'll be found guilty. Isn't that a perversion of our jurisprudence? If a not-guilty verdict is impossible, then the trial is a sham. "Sentence first -- verdict afterward" said the Red Queen.Moreover, the Justice Department has assured Sen. Jon Kyl that "we will not release anyone into the United States if doing so would endanger our national security or the American people." So in the event that KSM is acquitted, it's the position of the Obama Justice Department that we would continue to hold him? How does that outcome burnish the reputation of our justice system?And while we're on the subject of not thinking things through, at a Senate hearing, Holder could not answer Sen. Lindsey Graham's question about how we would deal with Osama bin Laden if we caught him tomorrow. Would he be Mirandized? Would we give him a lawyer? Isn't that the precedent this decision sets?There are dozens more reasons (including the intelligence bonanza this will confer on al-Qaida) that this decision is among the worst to emerge from a terrible presidency. What did they hope to achieve? Perhaps they have thought it through -- at least as far as how the trial would unfold. With no defense (he has boasted about his mass murder), what will KSM do? He will put the CIA and the Bush administration on trial. Prepare for lurid accounts of his and others' mistreatment.Is that the nub? To satisfy the revenge fantasies of American leftists who have lusted to put the Bush administration on trial, the Obama administration is willing to sacrifice logic, justice, national security, and honor?When KSM's star turn in the courtroom goes viral on the Internet and inspires thousands of new jihadis, the Obamaites can console themselves that at least they stuck it to George W. Bush.http://townhall.com/columnists/MonaCharen/2009/11/20/holders_true_motive nonadult false Trying Bush text blog 24 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4753636&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2807294_80539_4753636_ap_160X120.jpg false 2 0 1506487 4753636 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_CBC-cries-racism/BLOG/1506418/80539.html http://www.pjtv.com/v/2737 http://www.pjtv.com/v/2737 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:33:50 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_CBC-cries-racism/BLOG/1506418/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-21T12:33:50Z fox29 http://www.pjtv.com/v/2737 nonadult false CBC cries "racism" text blog 33 3 2.3333333 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 7 0 1506418 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_PUN-OF-THE-DAY/BLOG/1506363/80539.html BEAUTIFULLY MANICURED LAWNS ARE HIGHTLY SOD AFTER. BEAUTIFULLY MANICURED LAWNS ARE HIGHTLY SOD AFTER. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:08:01 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_PUN-OF-THE-DAY/BLOG/1506363/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-21T10:08:01Z fox29 BEAUTIFULLY MANICURED LAWNS ARE HIGHTLY SOD AFTER. nonadult false PUN OF THE DAY text blog 19 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 7 0 1506363 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Climategate/BLOG/1505136/80539.html Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'? Written by James Delingpole, Telegraph   Friday, November 20 2009 17:21  If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)• Searchable CRU email databaseWhen you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:“In an odd way this is cheering news.”But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.Here are a few tasters. (So far, we can only refer to them as alleged emails because – though Hadley CRU’s director Phil Jones has confirmed the break-in to Ian Wishart at the Briefing Room – he has yet to fess up to any specific contents.) But if genuine, they suggest dubious practices such as:Manipulation of evidence:I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.Suppression of evidence:Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”Hadley CRU has form in this regard. In September – I wrote the story up here as “How the global warming industry is based on a massive lie” – Hadley CRU’s researchers were exposed as having “cherry-picked” data in order to support their untrue claim that global temperatures had risen higher at the end of the 20th century than at any time in the last millenium. Hadley CRU was also the organisation which – in contravention of all acceptable behaviour in the international scientific community – spent years withholding data from researchers it deemed unhelpful to its cause. This matters because Hadley CRU, established in 1990 by the Met Office, is a government-funded body which is supposed to be a model of rectitude. Its HadCrut record is one of the four official sources of global temperature data used by the IPCC.I asked in my title whether this will be the final nail in the coffin of Anthropenic Global Warming. This was wishful thinking, of course. In the run up to Copenhagen, we will see more and more hysterical (and grotesquely exaggerated) stories such as this in the Mainstream Media. And we will see ever-more-virulent campaigns conducted by eco-fascist activists, such as this risible new advertising campaign by Plane Stupid showing CGI polar bears falling from the sky and exploding because kind of, like, man, that’s sort of what happens whenever you take another trip on an aeroplane.The world is currently cooling; electorates are increasingly reluctant to support eco-policies leading to more oppressive regulation, higher taxes and higher utility bills; the tide is turning against Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. The so-called “sceptical” view is now also the majority view.Unfortunately, we’ve a long, long way to go before the public mood (and scientific truth) is reflected by our policy makers. There are too many vested interests in AGW, with far too much to lose either in terms of reputation or money, for this to end without a bitter fight.But if the Hadley CRU scandal is true,it’s a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility which is never likely to recover.Source Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'? Written by James Delingpole, Telegraph   Friday, November 20 2009 17:21  If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)• Searchable CRU email databaseWhen you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:“In an odd way this is cheering news.”But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.Here are a few tasters. (So far, we can only refer to them as alleged emails because – though Hadley CRU’s director Phil Jones has confirmed the break-in to Ian Wishart at the Briefing Room – he has yet to fess up to any specific contents.) But if genuine, they suggest dubious practices such as:Manipulation of evidence:I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.Suppression of evidence:Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”Hadley CRU has form in this regard. In September – I wrote the story up here as “How the global warming industry is based on a massive lie” – Hadley CRU’s researchers were exposed as having “cherry-picked” data in order to support their untrue claim that global temperatures had risen higher at the end of the 20th century than at any time in the last millenium. Hadley CRU was also the organisation which – in contravention of all acceptable behaviour in the international scientific community – spent years withholding data from researchers it deemed unhelpful to its cause. This matters because Hadley CRU, established in 1990 by the Met Office, is a government-funded body which is supposed to be a model of rectitude. Its HadCrut record is one of the four official sources of global temperature data used by the IPCC.I asked in my title whether this will be the final nail in the coffin of Anthropenic Global Warming. This was wishful thinking, of course. In the run up to Copenhagen, we will see more and more hysterical (and grotesquely exaggerated) stories such as this in the Mainstream Media. And we will see ever-more-virulent campaigns conducted by eco-fascist activists, such as this risible new advertising campaign by Plane Stupid showing CGI polar bears falling from the sky and exploding because kind of, like, man, that’s sort of what happens whenever you take another trip on an aeroplane.The world is currently cooling; electorates are increasingly reluctant to support eco-policies leading to more oppressive regulation, higher taxes and higher utility bills; the tide is turning against Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. The so-called “sceptical” view is now also the majority view.Unfortunately, we’ve a long, long way to go before the public mood (and scientific truth) is reflected by our policy makers. There are too many vested interests in AGW, with far too much to lose either in terms of reputation or money, for this to end without a bitter fight.But if the Hadley CRU scandal is true,it’s a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility which is never likely to recover.Source Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:48:09 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Climategate/BLOG/1505136/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-21T01:48:09Z fox29 Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'? Written by James Delingpole, Telegraph   Friday, November 20 2009 17:21  If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)• Searchable CRU email databaseWhen you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:“In an odd way this is cheering news.”But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.Here are a few tasters. (So far, we can only refer to them as alleged emails because – though Hadley CRU’s director Phil Jones has confirmed the break-in to Ian Wishart at the Briefing Room – he has yet to fess up to any specific contents.) But if genuine, they suggest dubious practices such as:Manipulation of evidence:I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.Suppression of evidence:Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….And, perhaps most reprehensibly, a long series of communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out of the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific climate in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank, whose views do not have a scrap of authority.“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !”Hadley CRU has form in this regard. In September – I wrote the story up here as “How the global warming industry is based on a massive lie” – Hadley CRU’s researchers were exposed as having “cherry-picked” data in order to support their untrue claim that global temperatures had risen higher at the end of the 20th century than at any time in the last millenium. Hadley CRU was also the organisation which – in contravention of all acceptable behaviour in the international scientific community – spent years withholding data from researchers it deemed unhelpful to its cause. This matters because Hadley CRU, established in 1990 by the Met Office, is a government-funded body which is supposed to be a model of rectitude. Its HadCrut record is one of the four official sources of global temperature data used by the IPCC.I asked in my title whether this will be the final nail in the coffin of Anthropenic Global Warming. This was wishful thinking, of course. In the run up to Copenhagen, we will see more and more hysterical (and grotesquely exaggerated) stories such as this in the Mainstream Media. And we will see ever-more-virulent campaigns conducted by eco-fascist activists, such as this risible new advertising campaign by Plane Stupid showing CGI polar bears falling from the sky and exploding because kind of, like, man, that’s sort of what happens whenever you take another trip on an aeroplane.The world is currently cooling; electorates are increasingly reluctant to support eco-policies leading to more oppressive regulation, higher taxes and higher utility bills; the tide is turning against Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. The so-called “sceptical” view is now also the majority view.Unfortunately, we’ve a long, long way to go before the public mood (and scientific truth) is reflected by our policy makers. There are too many vested interests in AGW, with far too much to lose either in terms of reputation or money, for this to end without a bitter fight.But if the Hadley CRU scandal is true,it’s a blow to the AGW lobby’s credibility which is never likely to recover.Source nonadult false Climategate? text blog 27 3 2.3333333 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 5 0 1505136 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Late-Friday-Humor/BLOG/1504980/80539.html The lesbian couple that live next door to me, asked me what I would like for my birthday. I was really quite surprised when they gave me a very expensive Rolex. Although it was very nice gesture by them, but I think that they may have misunderstood me when I said,  ‘I wanna watch.’ The lesbian couple that live next door to me, asked me what I would like for my birthday. I was really quite surprised when they gave me a very expensive Rolex. Although it was very nice gesture by them, but I think that they may have misunderstood me when I said,  ‘I wanna watch.’ Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:31:41 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Late-Friday-Humor/BLOG/1504980/80539.html starrman1 2009-11-20T23:31:41Z fox29 The lesbian couple that live next door to me, asked me what I would like for my birthday. I was really quite surprised when they gave me a very expensive Rolex. Although it was very nice gesture by them, but I think that they may have misunderstood me when I said,  ‘I wanna watch.’ nonadult false Late Friday Humor text blog 39 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4887428&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_4584489_80539_4887428_ap_160X120.jpg false 3 0 1504980 4887428 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_90-things-Obama-has-done/BLOG/1504953/80539.html I am so surprised my right wing friends have not gotten this .... Telling ThoughtsI received this information via email from from a genuine Obama supporter today. I have no reason to doubt the the claims made or the authenticity of the original source. I have added a link to the author’s (Dr Robert Watson) Lynn University Boca Raton website. As you will see he has very impressive credentials. This information is definitely worth circulating.PS. You may even care to send him an email.[image]Forwarding source quote:-” The author of this information is Professor Robert Watson of Lynn University“Hi friends,I am always being asked to grade Obama’s presidency. In place of offering him a grade, I put together a list of his accomplishments thus far. I think you would agree that it is very impressive. His first six months have been even more active than FDRs or LBJs the two standards for such assessments. Yet, there is little media attention given to much of what he has done.Of late, the media is focusing almost exclusively on Obama’s critics, without holding them responsible for the uncivil, unconstructive tone of their disagreements or without holding the previous administration responsible for getting us in such a deep hole. The misinformation and venom that now passes for political reporting and civic debate is beyond description.As such, there is a need to set the record straight. What most impresses me is the fact that Obama has accomplished so much not from a heavy-handed or top-down approach but from a style that has institutionalized efforts to reach across the aisle, encourage vigorous debate, and utilize town halls and panels of experts in the policy-making process.Beyond the accomplishments, the process is good for democracy and our democratic processes have been battered and bruised in recent years.Let me know if I missed anything in the list (surely I did).Robert1. Ordered all federal agencies to undertake a study and make recommendations for ways to cut spending2. Ordered a review of all federal operations to identify and cut wasteful spending and practices3. Instituted enforcement for equal pay for women4. Beginning the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq5. Families of fallen soldiers have expenses covered to be on hand when the body arrives at Dover AFB6. Ended media blackout on war casualties; reporting full information7. Ended media blackout on covering the return of fallen soldiers to Dover AFB; the media is now permitted to do so pending adherence to respectful rules and approval of fallen soldier’s family8. The White House and federal government are respecting the Freedom of Information Act9. Instructed all federal agencies to promote openness and transparency as much as possible10. Limits on lobbyist’s access to the White House11. Limits on White House aides working for lobbyists after their tenure in the administration12. Ended the previous stop-loss policy that kept soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan longer than their enlistment date13. Phasing out the expensive F-22 war plane and other outdated weapons systems, which weren’t even used or needed in Iraq/Afghanistan14. Removed restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research15. Federal support for stem-cell and new biomedical research16. New federal funding for science and research labs17. States are permitted to enact federal fuel efficiency standards above federal standards18. Increased infrastructure spending (roads, bridges, power plants) after years of neglect19. Funds for high-speed, broadband Internet access to K-12 schools20. New funds for school construction21. The prison at Guantanamo Bay is being phased out22. US Auto industry rescue plan23. Housing rescue plan24. $789 billion economic stimulus plan25. The public can meet with federal housing insurers to refinance (the new plan can be completed in one day) a mortgage if they are having trouble paying26. US financial and banking rescue plan27. The secret detention facilities in Eastern Europe and elsewhere are being closed28. Ended the previous policy; the US now has a no torture policy and is in compliance with the Geneva Convention standards29. Better body armor is now being provided to our troops30. The missile defense program is being cut by $1.4 billion in 201031. Restarted the nuclear nonproliferation talks and building back up the nuclear inspection infrastructure/protocols32. Reengaged in the treaties/agreements to protect the Antarctic33. Reengaged in the agreements/talks on global warming and greenhouse gas emissions34. Visited more countries and met with more world leaders than any president in his first six months in office35. Successful release of US captain held by Somali pirates; authorized the SEALS to do their job36. US Navy increasing patrols off Somali coast37. Attractive tax write-offs for those who buy hybrid automobiles38. Cash for clunkers program offers vouchers to trade in fuel inefficient, polluting old cars for new cars; stimulated auto sales39. Announced plans to purchase fuel efficient American-made fleet for the federal government40. Expanded the SCHIP program to cover health care for 4 million more children41. Signed national service legislation; expanded national youth service program42. Instituted a new policy on Cuba, allowing Cuban families to return home to visit loved ones43. Ended the previous policy of not regulating and labeling carbon dioxide emissions44. Expanding vaccination programs45. Immediate and efficient response to the floods in North Dakota and other natural disasters46. Closed offshore tax safe havens47. Negotiated deal with Swiss banks to permit US government to gain access to records of tax evaders and criminals48. Ended the previous policy of offering tax benefits to corporations who outsource American jobs; the new policy is to promote in-sourcing to bring jobs back49. Ended the previous practice of protecting credit card companies; in place of it are new consumer protections from credit card industry’s predatory practices50. Energy producing plants must begin preparing to produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources51. Lower drug costs for seniors52. Ended the previous practice of forbidding Medicare from negotiating with drug manufacturers for cheaper drugs; the federal government is now realizing hundreds of millions in savings53. Increasing pay and benefits for military personnel54. Improved housing for military personnel55. Initiating a new policy to promote federal hiring of military spouses56. Improved conditions at Walter Reed Military Hospital and other military hospitals57. Increasing student loans58. Increasing opportunities in AmeriCorps program59. Sent envoys to Middle East and other parts of the world that had been neglected for years; reengaging in multilateral and bilateral talks and diplomacy60. Established a new cyber security office61. Beginning the process of reforming and restructuring the military 20 years after the Cold War to a more modern fighting force; this includes new procurement policies, increasing size of military, new technology and cyber units and operations, etc.62. Ended previous policy of awarding no-bid defense contracts63. Ordered a review of hurricane and natural disaster preparedness64. Established a National Performance Officer charged with saving the federal government money and making federal operations more efficient65. Students struggling to make college loan payments can have their loans refinanced66. Improving benefits for veterans67. Many more press conferences and town halls and much more media access than previous administration68. Instituted a new focus on mortgage fraud69. The FDA is now regulating tobacco70. Ended previous policy of cutting the FDA and circumventing FDA rules71. Ended previous practice of having White House aides rewrite scientific and environmental rules, regulations, and reports72. Authorized discussions with North Korea and private mission by Pres. Bill Clinton to secure the release of two Americans held in prisons73. Authorized discussions with Myanmar and mission by Sen. Jim Web to secure the release of an American held captive74. Making more loans available to small businesses75. Established independent commission to make recommendations on slowing the costs of Medicare76. Appointment of first Latina to the Supreme Court77. Authorized construction/opening of additional health centers to care for veterans78. Limited salaries of senior White House aides; cut to $100,00079. Renewed loan guarantees for Israel80. Changed the failing/status quo military command in Afghanistan81. Deployed additional troops to Afghanistan82. New Afghan War policy that limits aerial bombing and prioritizes aid, development of infrastructure, diplomacy, and good government practices by Afghans83. Announced the long-term development of a national energy grid with renewable sources and cleaner, efficient energy production84. Returned money authorized for refurbishment of White House offices and private living quarters85. Paid for redecoration of White House living quarters out of his own pocket86. Held first Seder in White House87. Attempting to reform the nation’s healthcare system which is the most expensive in the world yet leaves almost 50 million without health insurance and millions more under insured88. Has put the ball in play for comprehensive immigration reform89. Has announced his intention to push for energy reform90. Has announced his intention to push for education reformOh, and he built a swing set for the girls outside the Oval Office!By / Robert P. Watson, Ph.D.Coordinator of American StudiesLynn University I am so surprised my right wing friends have not gotten this .... Telling ThoughtsI received this information via email from from a genuine Obama supporter today. I have no reason to doubt the the claims made or the authenticity of the original source. I have added a link to the author’s (Dr Robert Watson) Lynn University Boca Raton website. As you will see he has very impressive credentials. This information is definitely worth circulating.PS. You may even care to send him an email.[image]Forwarding source quote:-” The author of this information is Professor Robert Watson of Lynn University“Hi friends,I am always being asked to grade Obama’s presidency. In place of offering him a grade, I put together a list of his accomplishments thus far. I think you would agree that it is very impressive. His first six months have been even more active than FDRs or LBJs the two standards for such assessments. Yet, there is little media attention given to much of what he has done.Of late, the media is focusing almost exclusively on Obama’s critics, without holding them responsible for the uncivil, unconstructive tone of their disagreements or without holding the previous administration responsible for getting us in such a deep hole. The misinformation and venom that now passes for political reporting and civic debate is beyond description.As such, there is a need to set the record straight. What most impresses me is the fact that Obama has accomplished so much not from a heavy-handed or top-down approach but from a style that has institutionalized efforts to reach across the aisle, encourage vigorous debate, and utilize town halls and panels of experts in the policy-making process.Beyond the accomplishments, the process is good for democracy and our democratic processes have been battered and bruised in recent years.Let me know if I missed anything in the list (surely I did).Robert1. Ordered all federal agencies to undertake a study and make recommendations for ways to cut spending2. Ordered a review of all federal operations to identify and cut wasteful spending and practices3. Instituted enforcement for equal pay for women4. Beginning the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq5. Families of fallen soldiers have expenses covered to be on hand when the body arrives at Dover AFB6. Ended media blackout on war casualties; reporting full information7. Ended media blackout on covering the return of fallen soldiers to Dover AFB; the media is now permitted to do so pending adherence to respectful rules and approval of fallen soldier’s family8. The White House and federal government are respecting the Freedom of Information Act9. Instructed all federal agencies to promote openness and transparency as much as possible10. Limits on lobbyist’s access to the White House11. Limits on White House aides working for lobbyists after their tenure in the administration12. Ended the previous stop-loss policy that kept soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan longer than their enlistment date13. Phasing out the expensive F-22 war plane and other outdated weapons systems, which weren’t even used or needed in Iraq/Afghanistan14. Removed restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research15. Federal support for stem-cell and new biomedical research16. New federal funding for science and research labs17. States are permitted to enact federal fuel efficiency standards above federal standards18. Increased infrastructure spending (roads, bridges, power plants) after years of neglect19. Funds for high-speed, broadband Internet access to K-12 schools20. New funds for school construction21. The prison at Guantanamo Bay is being phased out22. US Auto industry rescue plan23. Housing rescue plan24. $789 billion economic stimulus plan25. The public can meet with federal housing insurers to refinance (the new plan can be completed in one day) a mortgage if they are having trouble paying26. US financial and banking rescue plan27. The secret detention facilities in Eastern Europe and elsewhere are being closed28. Ended the previous policy; the US now has a no torture policy and is in compliance with the Geneva Convention standards29. Better body armor is now being provided to our troops30. The missile defense program is being cut by $1.4 billion in 201031. Restarted the nuclear nonproliferation talks and building back up the nuclear inspection infrastructure/protocols32. Reengaged in the treaties/agreements to protect the Antarctic33. Reengaged in the agreements/talks on global warming and greenhouse gas emissions34. Visited more countries and met with more world leaders than any president in his first six months in office35. Successful release of US captain held by Somali pirates; authorized the SEALS to do their job36. US Navy increasing patrols off Somali coast37. Attractive tax write-offs for those who buy hybrid automobiles38. Cash for clunkers program offers vouchers to trade in fuel inefficient, polluting old cars for new cars; stimulated auto sales39. Announced plans to purchase fuel efficient American-made fleet for the federal government40. Expanded the SCHIP program to cover health care for 4 million more children41. Signed national service legislation; expanded national youth service program42. Instituted a new policy on Cuba, allowing Cuban families to return home to visit loved ones43. Ended the previous policy of not regulating and labeling carbon dioxide emissions44. Expanding vaccination programs45. Immediate and efficient response to the floods in North Dakota and other natural disasters46. Closed offshore tax safe havens47. Negotiated deal with Swiss banks to permit US government to gain access to records of tax evaders and criminals48. Ended the previous policy of offering tax benefits to corporations who outsource American jobs; the new policy is to promote in-sourcing to bring jobs back49. Ended the previous practice of protecting credit card companies; in place of it are new consumer protections from credit card industry’s predatory practices50. Energy producing plants must begin preparing to produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources51. Lower drug costs for seniors52. Ended the previous practice of forbidding Medicare from negotiating with drug manufacturers for cheaper drugs; the federal government is now realizing hundreds of millions in savings53. Increasing pay and benefits for military personnel54. Improved housing for military personnel55. Initiating a new policy to promote federal hiring of military spouses56. Improved conditions at Walter Reed Military Hospital and other military hospitals57. Increasing student loans58. Increasing opportunities in AmeriCorps program59. Sent envoys to Middle East and other parts of the world that had been neglected for years; reengaging in multilateral and bilateral talks and diplomacy60. Established a new cyber security office61. Beginning the process of reforming and restructuring the military 20 years after the Cold War to a more modern fighting force; this includes new procurement policies, increasing size of military, new technology and cyber units and operations, etc.62. Ended previous policy of awarding no-bid defense contracts63. Ordered a review of hurricane and natural disaster preparedness64. Established a National Performance Officer charged with saving the federal government money and making federal operations more efficient65. Students struggling to make college loan payments can have their loans refinanced66. Improving benefits for veterans67. Many more press conferences and town halls and much more media access than previous administration68. Instituted a new focus on mortgage fraud69. The FDA is now regulating tobacco70. Ended previous policy of cutting the FDA and circumventing FDA rules71. Ended previous practice of having White House aides rewrite scientific and environmental rules, regulations, and reports72. Authorized discussions with North Korea and private mission by Pres. Bill Clinton to secure the release of two Americans held in prisons73. Authorized discussions with Myanmar and mission by Sen. Jim Web to secure the release of an American held captive74. Making more loans available to small businesses75. Established independent commission to make recommendations on slowing the costs of Medicare76. Appointment of first Latina to the Supreme Court77. Authorized construction/opening of additional health centers to care for veterans78. Limited salaries of senior White House aides; cut to $100,00079. Renewed loan guarantees for Israel80. Changed the failing/status quo military command in Afghanistan81. Deployed additional troops to Afghanistan82. New Afghan War policy that limits aerial bombing and prioritizes aid, development of infrastructure, diplomacy, and good government practices by Afghans83. Announced the long-term development of a national energy grid with renewable sources and cleaner, efficient energy production84. Returned money authorized for refurbishment of White House offices and private living quarters85. Paid for redecoration of White House living quarters out of his own pocket86. Held first Seder in White House87. Attempting to reform the nation’s healthcare system which is the most expensive in the world yet leaves almost 50 million without health insurance and millions more under insured88. Has put the ball in play for comprehensive immigration reform89. Has announced his intention to push for energy reform90. Has announced his intention to push for education reformOh, and he built a swing set for the girls outside the Oval Office!By / Robert P. Watson, Ph.D.Coordinator of American StudiesLynn University Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:18:04 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_90-things-Obama-has-done/BLOG/1504953/80539.html DeweyDevil 2009-11-20T23:18:04Z fox29 I am so surprised my right wing friends have not gotten this .... Telling ThoughtsI received this information via email from from a genuine Obama supporter today. I have no reason to doubt the the claims made or the authenticity of the original source. I have added a link to the author’s (Dr Robert Watson) Lynn University Boca Raton website. As you will see he has very impressive credentials. This information is definitely worth circulating.PS. You may even care to send him an email.[image]Forwarding source quote:-” The author of this information is Professor Robert Watson of Lynn University“Hi friends,I am always being asked to grade Obama’s presidency. In place of offering him a grade, I put together a list of his accomplishments thus far. I think you would agree that it is very impressive. His first six months have been even more active than FDRs or LBJs the two standards for such assessments. Yet, there is little media attention given to much of what he has done.Of late, the media is focusing almost exclusively on Obama’s critics, without holding them responsible for the uncivil, unconstructive tone of their disagreements or without holding the previous administration responsible for getting us in such a deep hole. The misinformation and venom that now passes for political reporting and civic debate is beyond description.As such, there is a need to set the record straight. What most impresses me is the fact that Obama has accomplished so much not from a heavy-handed or top-down approach but from a style that has institutionalized efforts to reach across the aisle, encourage vigorous debate, and utilize town halls and panels of experts in the policy-making process.Beyond the accomplishments, the process is good for democracy and our democratic processes have been battered and bruised in recent years.Let me know if I missed anything in the list (surely I did).Robert1. Ordered all federal agencies to undertake a study and make recommendations for ways to cut spending2. Ordered a review of all federal operations to identify and cut wasteful spending and practices3. Instituted enforcement for equal pay for women4. Beginning the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq5. Families of fallen soldiers have expenses covered to be on hand when the body arrives at Dover AFB6. Ended media blackout on war casualties; reporting full information7. Ended media blackout on covering the return of fallen soldiers to Dover AFB; the media is now permitted to do so pending adherence to respectful rules and approval of fallen soldier’s family8. The White House and federal government are respecting the Freedom of Information Act9. Instructed all federal agencies to promote openness and transparency as much as possible10. Limits on lobbyist’s access to the White House11. Limits on White House aides working for lobbyists after their tenure in the administration12. Ended the previous stop-loss policy that kept soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan longer than their enlistment date13. Phasing out the expensive F-22 war plane and other outdated weapons systems, which weren’t even used or needed in Iraq/Afghanistan14. Removed restrictions on embryonic stem-cell research15. Federal support for stem-cell and new biomedical research16. New federal funding for science and research labs17. States are permitted to enact federal fuel efficiency standards above federal standards18. Increased infrastructure spending (roads, bridges, power plants) after years of neglect19. Funds for high-speed, broadband Internet access to K-12 schools20. New funds for school construction21. The prison at Guantanamo Bay is being phased out22. US Auto industry rescue plan23. Housing rescue plan24. $789 billion economic stimulus plan25. The public can meet with federal housing insurers to refinance (the new plan can be completed in one day) a mortgage if they are having trouble paying26. US financial and banking rescue plan27. The secret detention facilities in Eastern Europe and elsewhere are being closed28. Ended the previous policy; the US now has a no torture policy and is in compliance with the Geneva Convention standards29. Better body armor is now being provided to our troops30. The missile defense program is being cut by $1.4 billion in 201031. Restarted the nuclear nonproliferation talks and building back up the nuclear inspection infrastructure/protocols32. Reengaged in the treaties/agreements to protect the Antarctic33. Reengaged in the agreements/talks on global warming and greenhouse gas emissions34. Visited more countries and met with more world leaders than any president in his first six months in office35. Successful release of US captain held by Somali pirates; authorized the SEALS to do their job36. US Navy increasing patrols off Somali coast37. Attractive tax write-offs for those who buy hybrid automobiles38. Cash for clunkers program offers vouchers to trade in fuel inefficient, polluting old cars for new cars; stimulated auto sales39. Announced plans to purchase fuel efficient American-made fleet for the federal government40. Expanded the SCHIP program to cover health care for 4 million more children41. Signed national service legislation; expanded national youth service program42. Instituted a new policy on Cuba, allowing Cuban families to return home to visit loved ones43. Ended the previous policy of not regulating and labeling carbon dioxide emissions44. Expanding vaccination programs45. Immediate and efficient response to the floods in North Dakota and other natural disasters46. Closed offshore tax safe havens47. Negotiated deal with Swiss banks to permit US government to gain access to records of tax evaders and criminals48. Ended the previous policy of offering tax benefits to corporations who outsource American jobs; the new policy is to promote in-sourcing to bring jobs back49. Ended the previous practice of protecting credit card companies; in place of it are new consumer protections from credit card industry’s predatory practices50. Energy producing plants must begin preparing to produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources51. Lower drug costs for seniors52. Ended the previous practice of forbidding Medicare from negotiating with drug manufacturers for cheaper drugs; the federal government is now realizing hundreds of millions in savings53. Increasing pay and benefits for military personnel54. Improved housing for military personnel55. Initiating a new policy to promote federal hiring of military spouses56. Improved conditions at Walter Reed Military Hospital and other military hospitals57. Increasing student loans58. Increasing opportunities in AmeriCorps program59. Sent envoys to Middle East and other parts of the world that had been neglected for years; reengaging in multilateral and bilateral talks and diplomacy60. Established a new cyber security office61. Beginning the process of reforming and restructuring the military 20 years after the Cold War to a more modern fighting force; this includes new procurement policies, increasing size of military, new technology and cyber units and operations, etc.62. Ended previous policy of awarding no-bid defense contracts63. Ordered a review of hurricane and natural disaster preparedness64. Established a National Performance Officer charged with saving the federal government money and making federal operations more efficient65. Students struggling to make college loan payments can have their loans refinanced66. Improving benefits for veterans67. Many more press conferences and town halls and much more media access than previous administration68. Instituted a new focus on mortgage fraud69. The FDA is now regulating tobacco70. Ended previous policy of cutting the FDA and circumventing FDA rules71. Ended previous practice of having White House aides rewrite scientific and environmental rules, regulations, and reports72. Authorized discussions with North Korea and private mission by Pres. Bill Clinton to secure the release of two Americans held in prisons73. Authorized discussions with Myanmar and mission by Sen. Jim Web to secure the release of an American held captive74. Making more loans available to small businesses75. Established independent commission to make recommendations on slowing the costs of Medicare76. Appointment of first Latina to the Supreme Court77. Authorized construction/opening of additional health centers to care for veterans78. Limited salaries of senior White House aides; cut to $100,00079. Renewed loan guarantees for Israel80. Changed the failing/status quo military command in Afghanistan81. Deployed additional troops to Afghanistan82. New Afghan War policy that limits aerial bombing and prioritizes aid, development of infrastructure, diplomacy, and good government practices by Afghans83. Announced the long-term development of a national energy grid with renewable sources and cleaner, efficient energy production84. Returned money authorized for refurbishment of White House offices and private living quarters85. Paid for redecoration of White House living quarters out of his own pocket86. Held first Seder in White House87. Attempting to reform the nation’s healthcare system which is the most expensive in the world yet leaves almost 50 million without health insurance and millions more under insured88. Has put the ball in play for comprehensive immigration reform89. Has announced his intention to push for energy reform90. Has announced his intention to push for education reformOh, and he built a swing set for the girls outside the Oval Office!By / Robert P. Watson, Ph.D.Coordinator of American StudiesLynn University nonadult false 90 things Obama has done. text blog 84 3 3.3333333 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4704978&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_5257680_80539_4704978_ap_160X120.jpg false 17 1 1504953 4704978 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_GLOBAL-WARMING-MY-AZZ/BLOG/1504949/80539.html Uh-oh. It looks like even the most hardened warmist theorists are now questioning themselves. Can we please return to rationality now? It's time the greenists and the liberal elites who embrace their every word be reduced to mere spectators on this planet. Can it be long unitl Al Gore is finally committed? Finally some sanity...at least for now; can someone tell Barry? It appears he's the last to know.http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html Uh-oh. It looks like even the most hardened warmist theorists are now questioning themselves. Can we please return to rationality now? It's time the greenists and the liberal elites who embrace their every word be reduced to mere spectators on this planet. Can it be long unitl Al Gore is finally committed? Finally some sanity...at least for now; can someone tell Barry? It appears he's the last to know.http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:14:52 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_GLOBAL-WARMING-MY-AZZ/BLOG/1504949/80539.html Happyg 2009-11-20T23:14:52Z fox29 Uh-oh. It looks like even the most hardened warmist theorists are now questioning themselves. Can we please return to rationality now? It's time the greenists and the liberal elites who embrace their every word be reduced to mere spectators on this planet. Can it be long unitl Al Gore is finally committed? Finally some sanity...at least for now; can someone tell Barry? It appears he's the last to know.http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html nonadult false GLOBAL WARMING MY AZZ text blog 29 2 3.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=10512827&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_5148291_80539_10512827_ap_160X120.jpg false 4 0 1504949 10512827 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Hereeeeees-Al/BLOG/1504792/80539.html Al Gore was on Conan O’Brien recently and they were discussing the current state of catholic school girl uniforms. No, not really. It would have been a lot cooler if they were because as usual with Al Gore, he was promoting the propaganda of global climate catastrophe.During the conversation, he exposed his vast intellect by explaining how the center of the Earth was really hot.No, hotter than that. Think “center of the sun” hot:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns_4pzfOSTc Al Gore was on Conan O’Brien recently and they were discussing the current state of catholic school girl uniforms. No, not really. It would have been a lot cooler if they were because as usual with Al Gore, he was promoting the propaganda of global climate catastrophe.During the conversation, he exposed his vast intellect by explaining how the center of the Earth was really hot.No, hotter than that. Think “center of the sun” hot:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns_4pzfOSTc Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:42:55 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Hereeeeees-Al/BLOG/1504792/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-20T20:42:55Z fox29 Al Gore was on Conan O’Brien recently and they were discussing the current state of catholic school girl uniforms. No, not really. It would have been a lot cooler if they were because as usual with Al Gore, he was promoting the propaganda of global climate catastrophe.During the conversation, he exposed his vast intellect by explaining how the center of the Earth was really hot.No, hotter than that. Think “center of the sun” hot:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns_4pzfOSTc nonadult false Hereeeeees Al... text blog 43 3 3.6666667 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 6 0 1504792 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_lets-go-back-to-hanging-wash/BLOG/1504786/80539.html     I saw coverage yesterday of a woman being harrassed for putting up a line and hanging out her wash.  Bravo ! this simple  measure could help reduce global warming if enough people would go back to doing it.  Of course we have to make it legal as many upscale neighborhoods actually ban the unsightly wash on a line.  How rediculous is that !     I saw coverage yesterday of a woman being harrassed for putting up a line and hanging out her wash.  Bravo ! this simple  measure could help reduce global warming if enough people would go back to doing it.  Of course we have to make it legal as many upscale neighborhoods actually ban the unsightly wash on a line.  How rediculous is that ! Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:39:56 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_lets-go-back-to-hanging-wash/BLOG/1504786/80539.html cheyiane 2009-11-20T20:39:56Z Sign Of The Times fox29     I saw coverage yesterday of a woman being harrassed for putting up a line and hanging out her wash.  Bravo ! this simple  measure could help reduce global warming if enough people would go back to doing it.  Of course we have to make it legal as many upscale neighborhoods actually ban the unsightly wash on a line.  How rediculous is that ! sign of the times nonadult false lets go back to hanging wash text blog sign of the times 31 0 0.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=18284205&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/user/defaultImage_160x120_A.jpg false United States NJ wildwood 08260 4 0 1504786 18284205 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Troops-for-holidays/BLOG/1504699/80539.html Go to ........."www.LetsSayThanks.com"to leave a message for the troops! ;good idea! I did this last year too![image] Go to ........."www.LetsSayThanks.com"to leave a message for the troops! ;good idea! I did this last year too![image] Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:36:28 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Troops-for-holidays/BLOG/1504699/80539.html phillygal5 2009-11-20T19:36:28Z fox29 Go to ........."www.LetsSayThanks.com"to leave a message for the troops! ;good idea! I did this last year too![image] nonadult false Troops for holidays! text blog 26 2 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4846671&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2692282_80539_4846671_ap_160X120.jpg false 3 0 1504699 4846671 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Just-Doing-Her-Job/BLOG/1504645/80539.html I was watching Fox29 report on the outcome of the trial for the cop slayer, when i remotely witnessed Sharon and her cameraman get assaulted. I'll tell you something. If anyone of those defendant relations hurts a hair on her head, heads themselves are gonna roll, if you catch my drift. Actually, I'm not the violent type as everyone knows me via blogging, but when it comes to animal abuse and Crowley abuse i  have no problem coming down into the city  and having a few words with anybody. {and i mean anyone} I think it's time to stop talking about things like this and just do it. Game on... I was watching Fox29 report on the outcome of the trial for the cop slayer, when i remotely witnessed Sharon and her cameraman get assaulted. I'll tell you something. If anyone of those defendant relations hurts a hair on her head, heads themselves are gonna roll, if you catch my drift. Actually, I'm not the violent type as everyone knows me via blogging, but when it comes to animal abuse and Crowley abuse i  have no problem coming down into the city  and having a few words with anybody. {and i mean anyone} I think it's time to stop talking about things like this and just do it. Game on... Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:02:49 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Just-Doing-Her-Job/BLOG/1504645/80539.html longriver7 2009-11-20T19:02:49Z fox29 I was watching Fox29 report on the outcome of the trial for the cop slayer, when i remotely witnessed Sharon and her cameraman get assaulted. I'll tell you something. If anyone of those defendant relations hurts a hair on her head, heads themselves are gonna roll, if you catch my drift. Actually, I'm not the violent type as everyone knows me via blogging, but when it comes to animal abuse and Crowley abuse i  have no problem coming down into the city  and having a few words with anybody. {and i mean anyone} I think it's time to stop talking about things like this and just do it. Game on... nonadult false Just Doing Her Job text blog 22 0 0.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4789224&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/user/defaultImage_160x120_E.jpg false 1 0 1504645 4789224 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Martial-Law/BLOG/1504587/80539.html Or, setting a precedent??Posted by Shannon Love on November 15th, 2009 In my previous post, I listed some (but far from all) of the practical problems presented by trying in a civil criminal court an individual (1) who was captured overseas, (2) had evidence against him collected using covert means, with (3) no chain of evidence or custody, and (4) was harshly and physically interrogated with (5) all witnesses and methods being secret.The greatest danger posed in the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) isn’t that he will go free. The greatest danger is that he will be convicted and that during his appeals the courts will ratify all of the extraordinary measures used to capture and convict him. The great danger is that the courts will ratify the rough, inaccurate and ambiguous norms of martial law as applying to all civil criminal trials.After a couple of decades of these court decisions reverberating throughout the legal system, we could end up living under de facto martial law. The Constitution recognizes only two types of trials, the civil and the military. The Fifth Amendment states:No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.Until the Obama administration overturned two centuries of precedence, America had two systems of justice, the civil and the military. The military system played a very small and focused role. It served rough justice in the chaos of war and in places like the open sea in which no nation’s law governed.For over two hundred years, those captured by the military outside the civil boundaries or caught carrying out military action on US soil, were tried by military tribunals. Up until the 1950s the military used drum head trials to convict and execute those found fighting in violation of custom and international law. Pirates were often hung at sea within hours of their capture. In WWII, anyone fighting disguised as a civilian faced summary execution with the approval of just three officers.For over two hundred years we were careful to keep a firewall between civil and martial law. We did so because civil and martial law are polar opposites. Civil law is focused on protecting the rights of the accused against the overwhelming power of the state. When there is doubt, the accused walks free. Martial law is focused on imposing a minimal order on bloody chaos. It was focused on allowing the military to complete its mission and win wars. When there is doubt, the accused is presumed guilty.Now, Obama wants to bring martial law into a civil court room in Manhattan. In order to let a civil conviction of KSM stand, the higher courts will have to overturn almost all the current constitutional protections of the accused.They will have to overturn the requirement for Miranda warnings. They will have to overturn the Fifth Amendment protection against self incrimination. They will have to overturn the right to face one’s accusers and to examine all evidence and evidence gathering methods.Even if the courts throw out his conviction, the government will never allow him to go free, so we will toss out protection against double jeopardy if they try to convict with a military tribunal, and toss out the right of no imprisonment without trial if they don’t.Our system of justice relies on precedent and equality of procedure. The same rules apply to every civil trail. We can’t say that it’s okay to deny the right against self-incrimination in one person’s trial while saying it’s okay in another. If the courts overturn the rights of one individual accused, it must overturn the rights of all of them.Nothing good will come of this trial.If it is conducted outside the bounds of normal civil law, it will be nothing but a corrupt show trial whose outcome was preordained by politicians. Instead of showing the world that America is a land of laws in which even our enemies receive fair treatment, it will show the world the opposite.If it is conducted within the bounds of normal civil law, then it will force the courts to choose between letting a mass murdering terrorist walk free and setting dangerous legal precedents that will undermine the basic civil rights of all Americans.Obama has unleashed something in America far, far more dangerous than any excesses Bush might have committed. He has taken all the horrible compromises we must make in war and driven them into the heart of the civil legal system. If the courts do not set Khalid Sheikh Mohammed free, the cancer of martial law will metastasize into the entire justice system.We may eventually wish we had never caught the bastard at all.Thoughts?? Or, setting a precedent??Posted by Shannon Love on November 15th, 2009 In my previous post, I listed some (but far from all) of the practical problems presented by trying in a civil criminal court an individual (1) who was captured overseas, (2) had evidence against him collected using covert means, with (3) no chain of evidence or custody, and (4) was harshly and physically interrogated with (5) all witnesses and methods being secret.The greatest danger posed in the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) isn’t that he will go free. The greatest danger is that he will be convicted and that during his appeals the courts will ratify all of the extraordinary measures used to capture and convict him. The great danger is that the courts will ratify the rough, inaccurate and ambiguous norms of martial law as applying to all civil criminal trials.After a couple of decades of these court decisions reverberating throughout the legal system, we could end up living under de facto martial law. The Constitution recognizes only two types of trials, the civil and the military. The Fifth Amendment states:No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.Until the Obama administration overturned two centuries of precedence, America had two systems of justice, the civil and the military. The military system played a very small and focused role. It served rough justice in the chaos of war and in places like the open sea in which no nation’s law governed.For over two hundred years, those captured by the military outside the civil boundaries or caught carrying out military action on US soil, were tried by military tribunals. Up until the 1950s the military used drum head trials to convict and execute those found fighting in violation of custom and international law. Pirates were often hung at sea within hours of their capture. In WWII, anyone fighting disguised as a civilian faced summary execution with the approval of just three officers.For over two hundred years we were careful to keep a firewall between civil and martial law. We did so because civil and martial law are polar opposites. Civil law is focused on protecting the rights of the accused against the overwhelming power of the state. When there is doubt, the accused walks free. Martial law is focused on imposing a minimal order on bloody chaos. It was focused on allowing the military to complete its mission and win wars. When there is doubt, the accused is presumed guilty.Now, Obama wants to bring martial law into a civil court room in Manhattan. In order to let a civil conviction of KSM stand, the higher courts will have to overturn almost all the current constitutional protections of the accused.They will have to overturn the requirement for Miranda warnings. They will have to overturn the Fifth Amendment protection against self incrimination. They will have to overturn the right to face one’s accusers and to examine all evidence and evidence gathering methods.Even if the courts throw out his conviction, the government will never allow him to go free, so we will toss out protection against double jeopardy if they try to convict with a military tribunal, and toss out the right of no imprisonment without trial if they don’t.Our system of justice relies on precedent and equality of procedure. The same rules apply to every civil trail. We can’t say that it’s okay to deny the right against self-incrimination in one person’s trial while saying it’s okay in another. If the courts overturn the rights of one individual accused, it must overturn the rights of all of them.Nothing good will come of this trial.If it is conducted outside the bounds of normal civil law, it will be nothing but a corrupt show trial whose outcome was preordained by politicians. Instead of showing the world that America is a land of laws in which even our enemies receive fair treatment, it will show the world the opposite.If it is conducted within the bounds of normal civil law, then it will force the courts to choose between letting a mass murdering terrorist walk free and setting dangerous legal precedents that will undermine the basic civil rights of all Americans.Obama has unleashed something in America far, far more dangerous than any excesses Bush might have committed. He has taken all the horrible compromises we must make in war and driven them into the heart of the civil legal system. If the courts do not set Khalid Sheikh Mohammed free, the cancer of martial law will metastasize into the entire justice system.We may eventually wish we had never caught the bastard at all.Thoughts?? Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:01:04 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Martial-Law/BLOG/1504587/80539.html ibejim 2009-11-20T18:01:04Z fox29 Or, setting a precedent??Posted by Shannon Love on November 15th, 2009 In my previous post, I listed some (but far from all) of the practical problems presented by trying in a civil criminal court an individual (1) who was captured overseas, (2) had evidence against him collected using covert means, with (3) no chain of evidence or custody, and (4) was harshly and physically interrogated with (5) all witnesses and methods being secret.The greatest danger posed in the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) isn’t that he will go free. The greatest danger is that he will be convicted and that during his appeals the courts will ratify all of the extraordinary measures used to capture and convict him. The great danger is that the courts will ratify the rough, inaccurate and ambiguous norms of martial law as applying to all civil criminal trials.After a couple of decades of these court decisions reverberating throughout the legal system, we could end up living under de facto martial law. The Constitution recognizes only two types of trials, the civil and the military. The Fifth Amendment states:No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.Until the Obama administration overturned two centuries of precedence, America had two systems of justice, the civil and the military. The military system played a very small and focused role. It served rough justice in the chaos of war and in places like the open sea in which no nation’s law governed.For over two hundred years, those captured by the military outside the civil boundaries or caught carrying out military action on US soil, were tried by military tribunals. Up until the 1950s the military used drum head trials to convict and execute those found fighting in violation of custom and international law. Pirates were often hung at sea within hours of their capture. In WWII, anyone fighting disguised as a civilian faced summary execution with the approval of just three officers.For over two hundred years we were careful to keep a firewall between civil and martial law. We did so because civil and martial law are polar opposites. Civil law is focused on protecting the rights of the accused against the overwhelming power of the state. When there is doubt, the accused walks free. Martial law is focused on imposing a minimal order on bloody chaos. It was focused on allowing the military to complete its mission and win wars. When there is doubt, the accused is presumed guilty.Now, Obama wants to bring martial law into a civil court room in Manhattan. In order to let a civil conviction of KSM stand, the higher courts will have to overturn almost all the current constitutional protections of the accused.They will have to overturn the requirement for Miranda warnings. They will have to overturn the Fifth Amendment protection against self incrimination. They will have to overturn the right to face one’s accusers and to examine all evidence and evidence gathering methods.Even if the courts throw out his conviction, the government will never allow him to go free, so we will toss out protection against double jeopardy if they try to convict with a military tribunal, and toss out the right of no imprisonment without trial if they don’t.Our system of justice relies on precedent and equality of procedure. The same rules apply to every civil trail. We can’t say that it’s okay to deny the right against self-incrimination in one person’s trial while saying it’s okay in another. If the courts overturn the rights of one individual accused, it must overturn the rights of all of them.Nothing good will come of this trial.If it is conducted outside the bounds of normal civil law, it will be nothing but a corrupt show trial whose outcome was preordained by politicians. Instead of showing the world that America is a land of laws in which even our enemies receive fair treatment, it will show the world the opposite.If it is conducted within the bounds of normal civil law, then it will force the courts to choose between letting a mass murdering terrorist walk free and setting dangerous legal precedents that will undermine the basic civil rights of all Americans.Obama has unleashed something in America far, far more dangerous than any excesses Bush might have committed. He has taken all the horrible compromises we must make in war and driven them into the heart of the civil legal system. If the courts do not set Khalid Sheikh Mohammed free, the cancer of martial law will metastasize into the entire justice system.We may eventually wish we had never caught the bastard at all.Thoughts?? nonadult false Martial Law?? text blog 41 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4703709&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2580312_80539_4703709_ap_160X120.jpg false 7 1 1504587 4703709 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Here-Comes-Trouble/BLOG/1504539/80539.html  Something very strange is happening in Egypt. For months, Egypt and the United States have been working to destroy the tunnels that Muslim arms smugglers have been using to move weapons into Gaza. But suddenly, and apparently without notice, the Egyptians have pulled the plug and bugged out. Here is what DEBKAfiles reported today., “Tuesday, Nov. 18, Egypt's special forces and engineering units suddenly shut down operation against the smuggling tunnels to Gaza without warning to Washington or Jerusalem, DEBKAfile's military sources report. US and Israeli requests for clarifications from Cairo, which must have ordered the stoppage, were not answered. So the Obama administration signaled Egypt that if it continues to violate the international accords governing the status of the Egyptian-Gazan border, there will be consequences. Washington is put out particularly because Cairo did not bother to notify the American engineering corps officers and men working with Egyptian troops in Sinai since early 2009 in a concerted effort to eradicate the tunnels that their mission was cut short. DEBKAfile's Washington sources report that the congressional subcommittees responsible for approving US economic and military aid appropriations to Egypt have been informed of the Egyptian violation.Our military sources report that the stoppage is pretty comprehensive:1. Egyptian forces have been pulled out of northern Sinai and Rafah, the town split down the middle between Egyptian Sinai and the Gaza Strip and under which most of the smuggling tunnels run. The trucks carrying heavy weapons for the Palestinians in Gaza can now unload directly into the tunnel openings without interference.2. The network of sensors and security cameras installed with the help of American military engineers in northern Sinai and along the Philadelphi border corridor were all deactivated as of last Tuesday.3. The Egyptians discontinued a major project for driving huge iron beams 16 meters deep into the tunnels as an obstruction to traffic. Some of the shafts caved in.4. Those beams were effective for disabling the 200-250 tunnels used to smuggle mostly civilian merchandise into the Gaza Strip because they are no more than 10-15 meters deep.  However, the roughly 50-60 "strategic tunnels" for the transportation of military hardware including heavy guns and missiles run 50-60 meters underground and are outside the range of the iron beams. They are moreover strong structures with reinforced concrete walls and ceilings, electric wiring, ventilation and safety hatches. Since the Egyptian troops' unexplained pullback from their border positions, hardware has been passing through those conduits freely and straight into the hands of Palestinian terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip.  So what is going on with the Egyptians? Why did they pull the plug on a moment’s notice? Why have they seemingly turned their backs on the Israelis, with whom they have a good relationship? Why have they basically said to terrorists, “Here ya go. Drive your stuff right through here. No problem!” My guess is that if this is true, expect the Israelis to take matters into their own military hands very soon. What choice do they have? To make an awful pun, something is not kosher here. Of course, now the even bigger question is, what, if anything will Obama’s administration do too get things back on track and therefore, keep the Israelis from taking things into their own hands?    Something very strange is happening in Egypt. For months, Egypt and the United States have been working to destroy the tunnels that Muslim arms smugglers have been using to move weapons into Gaza. But suddenly, and apparently without notice, the Egyptians have pulled the plug and bugged out. Here is what DEBKAfiles reported today., “Tuesday, Nov. 18, Egypt's special forces and engineering units suddenly shut down operation against the smuggling tunnels to Gaza without warning to Washington or Jerusalem, DEBKAfile's military sources report. US and Israeli requests for clarifications from Cairo, which must have ordered the stoppage, were not answered. So the Obama administration signaled Egypt that if it continues to violate the international accords governing the status of the Egyptian-Gazan border, there will be consequences. Washington is put out particularly because Cairo did not bother to notify the American engineering corps officers and men working with Egyptian troops in Sinai since early 2009 in a concerted effort to eradicate the tunnels that their mission was cut short. DEBKAfile's Washington sources report that the congressional subcommittees responsible for approving US economic and military aid appropriations to Egypt have been informed of the Egyptian violation.Our military sources report that the stoppage is pretty comprehensive:1. Egyptian forces have been pulled out of northern Sinai and Rafah, the town split down the middle between Egyptian Sinai and the Gaza Strip and under which most of the smuggling tunnels run. The trucks carrying heavy weapons for the Palestinians in Gaza can now unload directly into the tunnel openings without interference.2. The network of sensors and security cameras installed with the help of American military engineers in northern Sinai and along the Philadelphi border corridor were all deactivated as of last Tuesday.3. The Egyptians discontinued a major project for driving huge iron beams 16 meters deep into the tunnels as an obstruction to traffic. Some of the shafts caved in.4. Those beams were effective for disabling the 200-250 tunnels used to smuggle mostly civilian merchandise into the Gaza Strip because they are no more than 10-15 meters deep.  However, the roughly 50-60 "strategic tunnels" for the transportation of military hardware including heavy guns and missiles run 50-60 meters underground and are outside the range of the iron beams. They are moreover strong structures with reinforced concrete walls and ceilings, electric wiring, ventilation and safety hatches. Since the Egyptian troops' unexplained pullback from their border positions, hardware has been passing through those conduits freely and straight into the hands of Palestinian terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip.  So what is going on with the Egyptians? Why did they pull the plug on a moment’s notice? Why have they seemingly turned their backs on the Israelis, with whom they have a good relationship? Why have they basically said to terrorists, “Here ya go. Drive your stuff right through here. No problem!” My guess is that if this is true, expect the Israelis to take matters into their own military hands very soon. What choice do they have? To make an awful pun, something is not kosher here. Of course, now the even bigger question is, what, if anything will Obama’s administration do too get things back on track and therefore, keep the Israelis from taking things into their own hands?   Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:22:15 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Here-Comes-Trouble/BLOG/1504539/80539.html K_Korner 2009-11-20T17:22:15Z fox29  Something very strange is happening in Egypt. For months, Egypt and the United States have been working to destroy the tunnels that Muslim arms smugglers have been using to move weapons into Gaza. But suddenly, and apparently without notice, the Egyptians have pulled the plug and bugged out. Here is what DEBKAfiles reported today., “Tuesday, Nov. 18, Egypt's special forces and engineering units suddenly shut down operation against the smuggling tunnels to Gaza without warning to Washington or Jerusalem, DEBKAfile's military sources report. US and Israeli requests for clarifications from Cairo, which must have ordered the stoppage, were not answered. So the Obama administration signaled Egypt that if it continues to violate the international accords governing the status of the Egyptian-Gazan border, there will be consequences. Washington is put out particularly because Cairo did not bother to notify the American engineering corps officers and men working with Egyptian troops in Sinai since early 2009 in a concerted effort to eradicate the tunnels that their mission was cut short. DEBKAfile's Washington sources report that the congressional subcommittees responsible for approving US economic and military aid appropriations to Egypt have been informed of the Egyptian violation.Our military sources report that the stoppage is pretty comprehensive:1. Egyptian forces have been pulled out of northern Sinai and Rafah, the town split down the middle between Egyptian Sinai and the Gaza Strip and under which most of the smuggling tunnels run. The trucks carrying heavy weapons for the Palestinians in Gaza can now unload directly into the tunnel openings without interference.2. The network of sensors and security cameras installed with the help of American military engineers in northern Sinai and along the Philadelphi border corridor were all deactivated as of last Tuesday.3. The Egyptians discontinued a major project for driving huge iron beams 16 meters deep into the tunnels as an obstruction to traffic. Some of the shafts caved in.4. Those beams were effective for disabling the 200-250 tunnels used to smuggle mostly civilian merchandise into the Gaza Strip because they are no more than 10-15 meters deep.  However, the roughly 50-60 "strategic tunnels" for the transportation of military hardware including heavy guns and missiles run 50-60 meters underground and are outside the range of the iron beams. They are moreover strong structures with reinforced concrete walls and ceilings, electric wiring, ventilation and safety hatches. Since the Egyptian troops' unexplained pullback from their border positions, hardware has been passing through those conduits freely and straight into the hands of Palestinian terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip.  So what is going on with the Egyptians? Why did they pull the plug on a moment’s notice? Why have they seemingly turned their backs on the Israelis, with whom they have a good relationship? Why have they basically said to terrorists, “Here ya go. Drive your stuff right through here. No problem!” My guess is that if this is true, expect the Israelis to take matters into their own military hands very soon. What choice do they have? To make an awful pun, something is not kosher here. Of course, now the even bigger question is, what, if anything will Obama’s administration do too get things back on track and therefore, keep the Israelis from taking things into their own hands?   nonadult false Here Comes Trouble text blog 39 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4754995&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2609755_80539_4754995_ap_160X120.jpg false 7 0 1504539 4754995 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Judge-Barack-Obama/BLOG/1504497/80539.html Re: Trial of KSMThis Week's 'Alpha Jackass' Award"I don't think it will be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him." --Judge Barack ObamaWhen questioned later on being judge, jury and executioner, he clarified, "What I said was, people will not be offended if that's the outcome. I'm not pre-judging, I'm not going to be in that courtroom, that's the job of prosecutors, the judge and the jury. What I'm absolutely clear about is that I have complete confidence in the American people and our legal traditions and the prosecutors, the tough prosecutors from New York who specialize in terrorism."(Patriot Post) Re: Trial of KSMThis Week's 'Alpha Jackass' Award"I don't think it will be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him." --Judge Barack ObamaWhen questioned later on being judge, jury and executioner, he clarified, "What I said was, people will not be offended if that's the outcome. I'm not pre-judging, I'm not going to be in that courtroom, that's the job of prosecutors, the judge and the jury. What I'm absolutely clear about is that I have complete confidence in the American people and our legal traditions and the prosecutors, the tough prosecutors from New York who specialize in terrorism."(Patriot Post) Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:57:06 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Judge-Barack-Obama/BLOG/1504497/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-20T16:57:06Z fox29 Re: Trial of KSMThis Week's 'Alpha Jackass' Award"I don't think it will be offensive at all when he's convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him." --Judge Barack ObamaWhen questioned later on being judge, jury and executioner, he clarified, "What I said was, people will not be offended if that's the outcome. I'm not pre-judging, I'm not going to be in that courtroom, that's the job of prosecutors, the judge and the jury. What I'm absolutely clear about is that I have complete confidence in the American people and our legal traditions and the prosecutors, the tough prosecutors from New York who specialize in terrorism."(Patriot Post) nonadult false Judge Barack Obama text blog 23 3 2.3333333 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 2 0 1504497 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Veterans-Day-2009/BLOG/1504494/80539.html       Looks as though the President forgot something...again.  Our Commander-in-Chief!                                   Today's Picture: The picture on our front page today.                                   Taken at Veterans Day ceremonies at the Tomb of the Unknowns.                                      www.lucianne.com[image]       Looks as though the President forgot something...again.  Our Commander-in-Chief!                                   Today's Picture: The picture on our front page today.                                   Taken at Veterans Day ceremonies at the Tomb of the Unknowns.                                      www.lucianne.com[image] Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:44:41 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_Veterans-Day-2009/BLOG/1504494/80539.html Asmodai_1 2009-11-20T16:44:41Z fox29       Looks as though the President forgot something...again.  Our Commander-in-Chief!                                   Today's Picture: The picture on our front page today.                                   Taken at Veterans Day ceremonies at the Tomb of the Unknowns.                                      www.lucianne.com[image] nonadult false Veteran's Day 2009 text blog 40 2 3.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4767121&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2952374_80539_4767121_ap_160X120.jpg false 8 0 1504494 4767121 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_I-Needed-a-Good-Laugh/BLOG/1504407/80539.html  Yesterday we took our dog to the vet. I’ll spare you the details. But $311.00 later we are waiting to hear about the results of his blood work and a few other things. I’m sure he is actually okay. Hey, dogs can get sick too. Anyway, this morning, after dutifully dropping off a specimen, I was driving home when I heard a commercial for Fox News, the, “…fair and balanced…” Fox news. Yup, the same news organization that has come under fire for misrepresenting video clips twice in the past week—the latest featuring Sarah Palin. Well, I got to thinking about Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, Matthews, and others that inhabit the network’s airwaves. Of course Fox suits try to scam us with the line that these guys are opinion guys, not the real news crew. This is most definitely true, but how many of the news talking heads can you name? And are they mentioned in the ratings contests? “Not bloody likely,” to quote  Seinfeld. Going to Fox for news is like going to Wikipedia as a source for your masters thesis. Slowly a smile crept across my face. It grew and grew until I started to laugh. The laughter got louder and louder as I drove. People approaching me in their cars must have thought I was crazy—we’ll talk about that on a different occasion! I laughed so hard at the concept of Fox being a “…fair and balanced…’ news network that soon tears rolled down my face. But I can’t fault Fox. Being a “fair and balanced” network advertises much easier than using a tag that says, “Fox News, the unfair and unbalanced network.” Somehow that doesn’t roll off the tongue so easily. So thanks Fox for cheering me up today. I needed the laugh.   Yesterday we took our dog to the vet. I’ll spare you the details. But $311.00 later we are waiting to hear about the results of his blood work and a few other things. I’m sure he is actually okay. Hey, dogs can get sick too. Anyway, this morning, after dutifully dropping off a specimen, I was driving home when I heard a commercial for Fox News, the, “…fair and balanced…” Fox news. Yup, the same news organization that has come under fire for misrepresenting video clips twice in the past week—the latest featuring Sarah Palin. Well, I got to thinking about Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, Matthews, and others that inhabit the network’s airwaves. Of course Fox suits try to scam us with the line that these guys are opinion guys, not the real news crew. This is most definitely true, but how many of the news talking heads can you name? And are they mentioned in the ratings contests? “Not bloody likely,” to quote  Seinfeld. Going to Fox for news is like going to Wikipedia as a source for your masters thesis. Slowly a smile crept across my face. It grew and grew until I started to laugh. The laughter got louder and louder as I drove. People approaching me in their cars must have thought I was crazy—we’ll talk about that on a different occasion! I laughed so hard at the concept of Fox being a “…fair and balanced…’ news network that soon tears rolled down my face. But I can’t fault Fox. Being a “fair and balanced” network advertises much easier than using a tag that says, “Fox News, the unfair and unbalanced network.” Somehow that doesn’t roll off the tongue so easily. So thanks Fox for cheering me up today. I needed the laugh.  Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:34:42 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_I-Needed-a-Good-Laugh/BLOG/1504407/80539.html K_Korner 2009-11-20T15:34:42Z fox29  Yesterday we took our dog to the vet. I’ll spare you the details. But $311.00 later we are waiting to hear about the results of his blood work and a few other things. I’m sure he is actually okay. Hey, dogs can get sick too. Anyway, this morning, after dutifully dropping off a specimen, I was driving home when I heard a commercial for Fox News, the, “…fair and balanced…” Fox news. Yup, the same news organization that has come under fire for misrepresenting video clips twice in the past week—the latest featuring Sarah Palin. Well, I got to thinking about Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly, Matthews, and others that inhabit the network’s airwaves. Of course Fox suits try to scam us with the line that these guys are opinion guys, not the real news crew. This is most definitely true, but how many of the news talking heads can you name? And are they mentioned in the ratings contests? “Not bloody likely,” to quote  Seinfeld. Going to Fox for news is like going to Wikipedia as a source for your masters thesis. Slowly a smile crept across my face. It grew and grew until I started to laugh. The laughter got louder and louder as I drove. People approaching me in their cars must have thought I was crazy—we’ll talk about that on a different occasion! I laughed so hard at the concept of Fox being a “…fair and balanced…’ news network that soon tears rolled down my face. But I can’t fault Fox. Being a “fair and balanced” network advertises much easier than using a tag that says, “Fox News, the unfair and unbalanced network.” Somehow that doesn’t roll off the tongue so easily. So thanks Fox for cheering me up today. I needed the laugh.  nonadult false I Needed a Good Laugh text blog 80 1 5.0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=4754995&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_2609755_80539_4754995_ap_160X120.jpg false 26 0 1504407 4754995 Member 0 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_FUNNY-THING-IS/BLOG/1504402/80539.html WHERE OH WHERE ARE ALL THOSE CRYING DEMS HIDING ?ARE THEY ALL AT THE GYM TAKING A SHOWER ? WELL 2010 IS FAST APPROACHING AND YOU ARE ALL HEREBY PLACED ON NOTICE.YOU AND YOUR FLAMING LEADER OBAMA ARE ALL DOOMED DOOMD I TELL YOU WHERE OH WHERE ARE ALL THOSE CRYING DEMS HIDING ?ARE THEY ALL AT THE GYM TAKING A SHOWER ? WELL 2010 IS FAST APPROACHING AND YOU ARE ALL HEREBY PLACED ON NOTICE.YOU AND YOUR FLAMING LEADER OBAMA ARE ALL DOOMED DOOMD I TELL YOU Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:30:31 GMT http://affiliate.kickapps.com/_FUNNY-THING-IS/BLOG/1504402/80539.html OLDIEBULLDOGGIE 2009-11-20T15:30:31Z fox29 WHERE OH WHERE ARE ALL THOSE CRYING DEMS HIDING ?ARE THEY ALL AT THE GYM TAKING A SHOWER ? WELL 2010 IS FAST APPROACHING AND YOU ARE ALL HEREBY PLACED ON NOTICE.YOU AND YOUR FLAMING LEADER OBAMA ARE ALL DOOMED DOOMD I TELL YOU nonadult false FUNNY THING IS text blog 99 3 2.3333333 http://affiliate.kickapps.com/service/displayKickPlace.kickAction?u=8340525&as=80539 http://media.kickstatic.com/kickapps/images/80539/photos/PHOTO_4445547_80539_8340525_ap_160X120.jpg false United States MA CENTERVILLE 02632 29 0 1504402 8340525 Member 0