s

Inauguration Day 2009

"Democrat Socialist Party" Resolution Will Pass RNC: Member

Mandm

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele has been roundly criticized by members of his party over his first 100 days in office.

 

 

A member of the Republican National Committee told me Tuesday that when the RNC meets in an extraordinary special session next week, it will approve a resolution rebranding Democrats as the “Democrat Socialist Party.”

When I asked if such a resolution would force RNC Chairman Michael Steele to use that label when talking about Democrats in all his speeches and press releases, the RNC member replied: “Who cares?”

Which pretty much sums up the attitude some members of the RNC have toward their chairman these days.

Steele wrote a memo last month opposing the resolution. Steele said that while he believes Democrats “are indeed marching America toward European-style socialism,” he also said in a (rare) flash of insight that officially referring to them as the Democrat Socialist Party “will accomplish little than to give the media and our opponents the opportunity to mischaracterize Republicans.”


Two other resolutions — to urge Republican lawmakers

to reject earmarks and to commend them for opposing “bailouts and reckless spending bills” — are also on the agenda, but language that would have denounced Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican turned Democrat, and Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins for voting for President Obama’s stimulus package has been dropped.

Steele didn’t want the special session to be held at all. The RNC will hold its regular summer meeting in July, and all matters could have waited until then. But the special session is being viewed by some in the party as a “comeuppance” for Steele and an implied criticism of his performance and behavior in his first 100 days in office.

Exercising a rarely used party rule that allows any 16 RNC members from 16 different states to demand a special meeting, conservatives in the party forced Steele’s hand, and now the special meeting will be tacked onto the end of a previously scheduled meeting of state party chairmen that will convene next week at National Harbor outside Washington. 

A further comeuppance — a vote of “no confidence” in Steele — is not being contemplated, I am informed, because Steele’s opponents in the RNC have already won a major victory by forcing him to accept greater controls on how he spends party funds.

Also, while there has been some talk about replacing Steele, few consider that likely, at least in the near future. “Without a Republican

president to decide on that change, that won’t happen,” the RNC member said.

But Steele is not a popular chairman within the RNC, and his recent statements that appeared to attack Mitt Romney and the Republican base have undermined his popularity even further.

Steele was elected to a two-year term as party chairman on Jan. 30 on the sixth ballot, but instead of quietly trying to consolidate power within the party and build up his image, he embarked on a publicity tour that included statements that some in the party considered baffling at best and incendiary at worst.

“He has a tin ear,” the RNC member told me when I asked him to name Steele’s worst problem. “He has a tin ear when it comes to the building (i.e., the RNC staff), the RNC and the party.”

Last Friday, when Steele was guest-hosting conservative pundit Bill Bennett’s radio show, a caller suggested that Romney would have been a stronger candidate against Barack Obama than John McCain but that liberals and the media had pushed for McCain to win the Republican nomination.

The caller was, perhaps, not making the most intellectually rigorous of arguments, but in his answer Steele seemed to outdo the caller.

“Remember, it was the base that rejected Mitt because of his switch on pro-life, from pro-choice to pro-life,” Steele replied. “It was the base that rejected Mitt because it had issues with Mormonism. It was the base that rejected Mitt because they thought he was back and forth and waffling on those very economic issues you’re talking about.”

Steele, who himself has said that abortion is a matter of “individual choice,” was opening old wounds not only by attacking Romney but also by suggesting the Republican base is bigoted when it comes to Mormons.

“His job should be to get everybody to sit down and focus on a message for the party and then get them to be the messengers,” the RNC member told me. “Steele wants to do the right thing, but he is clueless as to how the RNC really runs.”

Roger Simon is POLITICO’s chief political columnist.


Read more: "GOP, RNC to rebrand Democrats as 'Socialists' - Roger Simon - POLITICO.com" - http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22445.html#ixzz0FaMFZnct&A




Man these people are so smart. Name the democrats something different and they will answer to it.
and then what! Will they no longer be in power? will everyone abandon them for the Rethugs? Will this make them look better, because they are calling democrats  names?

Comments




  • We-e-e-e-ell, you know -- I don't know -- I have a little different take on this RNC Chair Michael Steele thing:  It's another one of those "Put-the-Black-Man-in Charge-to-Clean-up-the-Mess" deals.  I get so tired of that.  Look back as far as when Eleanor Holmes Norton was head of the EEOC.  There was such a heavy backlog of cases submitted by Black people for the injustices that occurred to them, that she did what no Caucasian Chairperson had the dubious "courage" to do:  Dismiss all the old backlog and just left the most recent cases to act upon.  I thought sadly of all those minorities who had waited all those years for reparation of the wrongs done to them: and for someone of their own race to "do them in" was unconscionable to me.  In fact, even to this day I cannot forgive her for it and hold all her words in circumspect.


    Then there was the then-newly elected Black Mayor of Philadelphia some time in the past who allowed the performance of an act that no Caucasian former mayor had the nerve to do:  dropped the bunker on the MOVE organization home, while destroying several others and killing women, children and the elderly.  Another example of dumping the Black man in to do your dirty work only when you [whites] do not have the audacity to do so.


    I need not pull out any other examples from the mothballs:  you get my point.  Heck, in fact that is why I originally supported Hillary instead of Barak.  I'm tired of the Black Man being used to "clean up the white man's mess."  And George Bush has certainly left this country at its nadyr, and why shouldn't Miss Thang take the brunt of the responsibility to "clean house" and then let the Black Man step in and "Ease on down the road" to victory.   Those were my original thoughts until I could no longer abide that woman's duplicity.  So early on I had to switch over to the Obama steamroller and just had to resort to "praying" his way through on a daily basis.  So even now I resent any of the Blacklash thrown his way when he is attacking an almost insurmountable task. 


    That then is my take on the Michael Steele situation.  The RNP could only finally allow a Black man at the helm when it found itself at its lowest point.  And although I find that reluctantly I admire Steele for his boldness to "step into this known trap,"  I can think only more lowly of his party when they allow the "Gold-Dust" twins, Rush and Chaney (yeah, I'm aware of the irony) to wreck havoc with their own party chairperson -- something I do not believe they would ever think to do if he were of their own pigment-persuasion.  So I find myself feeling very sorry for him and hope he can continue to withstand the self-inflicted pain from his own party.  What we Black people must endure!


                                             Mliza


                                             Political Independent

    Mliza, 10 months ago | Flag
  • Everyone knows that RNC Michael Steele gets "no love" from most Republicans and we already know that at 80% of the hardcore Republican base is just plain crazy.

    TheSarge1960, 10 months ago | Flag
Uploaded By: pinkiehot52
10 months ago

Tags:

Inappropriate Flag

Flagging notifies the Inauguration Day 2009 webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!

If you believe this content violates the Terms of Service, please write a short description why. Thank you.

Inappropriate Comment Flag

Flagging notifies the Inauguration Day 2009 webmaster of inappropriate content. Please flag any messages that violate the Terms of Service. Please include a short explanation why you're flagging this message. Thank you!

Email Friends

Your First Name (optional)

Email Addresses (comma separated)

Import friends

Message to Friends (optional)

Are you human?

Or, you can forward this blog with your own email application.

Terms of Service

Login
Username or Email Address:
Password:
   

Join Now

Join the Inauguration Day 2009 community for the full, feature-rich experience. As a member, you'll be able to share your media and thoughts with other Inauguration Day 2009 users. It's free and easy. Join now.